UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.      )

Filed by the Registrantþ                     Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

þDefinitive Proxy Statement

 

¨Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

þNo fee required.

 

¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 5)Total fee paid:

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

 2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 3)Filing Party:

 

 4)Date Filed:


LOGO

130 Royall Street

Canton, Massachusetts 02021

March 28, 201627, 2017

Dear Shareholder:

We cordially invite you to attend our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Wednesday, May 11, 2016,10, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. (local time), to be held at the Boston Marriott Quincy, 1000 Marriott Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169.

Again this year, Dunkin’ Brands has elected to deliver our proxy materials to the majority of our shareholders over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow companies to furnish proxy materials to shareholders over the Internet. This delivery process allows us to provide shareholders with the information they need, while at the same time conserving natural resources and lowering the cost of delivery. On March 28, 2016,27, 2017, we mailed to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) containing instructions on how to access our proxy statement for our 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our 20152016 Annual Report. The Notice also provides instructions on how to vote online or by telephone and includes instructions on how to receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail.

The Notice will serve as an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. On March 28, 2016,27, 2017, we also first mailed this proxy statement and the enclosed proxy card to certain shareholders. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials in the mail, the proxy card includes an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. You may alternatively present a brokerage statement showing proof of your ownership of Dunkin’ Brands stock as of March 16, 2017.All shareholders must also present a valid form of government-issued picture identification in order to attend.

The proxy statement accompanying this letter describes the business we will consider at the meeting. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to consider the matters presented in the proxy statement and vote as soon as possible.

We hope that you will be able to join us on May 11th.10th.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Nigel Travis

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 11, 201610, 2017

The 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the Boston Marriott Quincy, 1000 Marriott Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169 on Wednesday, May 11, 2016,10, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. (local time) for the following purposes as further described in the proxy statement accompanying this notice:

 

To elect the threetwo directors specifically named in the proxy statement, each for a term of three years.

 

To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid by the Company to its named executive officers (the “say-on-pay“say-on-pay vote”).

 

To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the current fiscal year.

 

To approve, if properly presented, a shareholder proposal regarding a report on the environmental impact ofK-Cup pods brand packaging.

To conduct any other business properly brought before the meeting.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 201616, 2017 are entitled to notice of, and entitled to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a Dunkin’ Brands shareholder as of the close of business on March 17, 2016,16, 2017, or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a shareholder. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the Notice will serve as an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials in the mail, the proxy card includes an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. You may alternatively present a brokerage statement showing proof of your ownership of Dunkin’ Brands stock as of March 17, 2016.16, 2017.All shareholders must also present a valid form of government-issued picture identification in order to attend. Please allow additional time for these procedures.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors
LOGO

Rich Emmett

Secretary

Canton, Massachusetts

March 28, 201627, 2017


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Proxy Statement

   1 

Proxy Summary

   2 

Board of Directors and Committees of the Board

   89 

Proposal 1—Election of Directors

   1315 

Corporate Governance

   1618 

Transactions with Related Persons

   1921 

Stock Ownership Information

   2022 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   2123 

Executive Compensation

   2224 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

   2224 

Report of the Compensation Committee

   4045 

20152016 Summary Compensation Table

   4146 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

   4348 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

   4550 

Options Exercises and Stock Vested

   4652 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

   4752 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

   4853 

Proposal 2—Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation

   5461 

Audit Committee Matters

   5562 

Audit Committee Report

   5562 

Proposal 3—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   5764

Proposal 4—Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on the Environmental Impact ofK-Cup Pods

65 

Voting Requirements and Proxies

   5869 

Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations

   5869 

Other Matters

   5869 

Attending the Annual Meeting

   5970 


Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May  11, 201610, 2017

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., or Dunkin’ Brands, is soliciting your proxy for the 20162017 Annual Meeting. Attendance in person or by proxy of a majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting is required for a quorum for the meeting.

You may vote on the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) that you received. If you received a paper copy of these proxy materials, included with such copy is a proxy card or a voting instruction card from your bank, broker or other nominee for the Annual Meeting. In addition to voting on the Internet, you may vote by telephone using the toll-free telephone number contained on the Notice, proxy card, or voting instruction card or by mail by completing and returning a proxy card or voting instruction card. Both Internet and telephone voting provideeasy-to-follow instructions and have procedures designed to authenticate your identity and permit you to confirm that your voting instructions are accurately reflected.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by voting later by telephone or Internet, returning a later-dated proxy card, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of Dunkin’ Brands.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 201616, 2017 are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 91,547,02792,066,316 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

This proxy statement, the proxy card and the Annual Report to Shareholders for our fiscal year ended December 26, 201531, 2016 (fiscal 2015)2016) are being first mailed or made available to shareholders on or about the date of the notice of meeting. Our address is 130 Royall Street, Canton, Massachusetts 02021.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on May 11, 2016:10, 2017: Our proxy statement is attached. Financial and other information concerning Dunkin’ Brands is contained in our annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015.31, 2016. The proxy statement and our fiscal 20152016 annual report to shareholders are available on our website at http://investor.dunkinbrands.com. Additionally, you may access our proxy materials at www.proxyvote.com, a site that does not have “cookies” that identify visitors to the site.


PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider before voting and you should read the entire proxy statement. For more complete information regarding the Company’s 20152016 performance, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015.31, 2016.

VOTING AND MEETING INFORMATION

It is very important that you vote in order to play a part in the future of the Company. Please carefully review the proxy materials for the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Wednesday, May 11, 201610, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. (local time) at the Boston Marriott Quincy, 1000 Marriott Park Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts.

Who is Eligible to Vote?

 

 

Shareholders of record at the close of business on March 17, 201616, 2017 are entitled to vote at the 20162017 Annual Meeting. Each of the 91,547,02792,066,316 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

How You May Vote

 

 

Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please vote using one of the following advance voting methods. Make sure to have your proxy card or voting instruction form in hand and follow the instructions:

 

INTERNET  PHONE  MAIL

 

LOGO

  LOGO  LOGO
Visit the website listed on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote via the internetinternet.  Call the telephone number on your proxy card/voting instruction form to vote by phone.  Sign, date and return your proxy card/voting instruction form in the enclosed envelope to vote by mail.

Attending the Annual Meeting

 

 

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a Dunkin’ Brands shareholder as of the close of business on March 17, 2016,16, 2017, or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a shareholder. Please see page 5970 of the Proxy Statement for further details.

 



Roadmap of Voting Matters

 

 

Shareholders are being asked to vote on the following matters at the 20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:

 

   Board Recommendation
Item 1.Election of Directors (page 13)15)
The Board believes that each Director nominee has the professional and personal qualifications and experiences to continue to meaningfully contribute to an effective and well-functioning Board.    FOR each Director Nominee
Item 2.Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (page 54)(page61)
The Company has designed its compensation programs to attract and retain industry-leading talent, to link compensation actually paid to achievement of our financial, operational and strategic goals, to reward individual performance and contribution to our success, and to enhance shareholder value by aligning the interests of our executive officers and shareholders through delivering a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation through equity-based awards with a long-term value horizon. The Company seeks anon-binding advisory vote from its shareholders to approve the compensation of its named executive officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 2224 and the Compensation Tables section beginning on page 41.46. The Board values shareowners’ opinions and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.    FOR
Item 3.Ratification of the Appointment of KPMG LLP as Independent Auditors (page 57)(page64)
The Audit Committee has appointed KPMG LLP to serve as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.30, 2017. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of KPMG LLP to serve as the Independent Auditors is in the best interests of the Company and its shareowners. As a matter of good corporate governance, shareowners are being asked to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of the independent auditors.    FOR
Item 4.Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on the Environmental Impact ofK-Cup Pods Brand Packaging (page 65)
The proposal calls for a report assessing the environmental impacts ofK-Cup pods brand packaging. The Company is not the manufacturer of Dunkin’ Donuts brandedK-Cup pods, which are made by our partner Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (“Keurig”). As the manufacturer of the packaging, Keurig is in the best position to provide the information called for by the proposal, and has made such information publicly available on its website. We have previously released a statement on sustainable packaging that is publicly available on our website, whichacknowledges Keurig’s publicly stated intention to make 100 percent ofK-Cup pods recyclable by 2020 and alsodirects readers to Keurig’s publicly available information regarding the environmental impact of itsK-Cup pods. The Company and the Board believe that all of the information asked for by the report is already publicly available and that the requested report would be a waste of our resources and not in the best interest of our shareholders, franchisees, or our guests.AGAINST

 



GOVERNANCE

The Company believes good governance is integral to achieving long-term shareholder value. We are committed to governance policies and practices that serve the interest of Dunkin’ Brands and our shareholders. The Board of Directors monitors developments in governance at peer companies and in general to assure that it continues to meet its commitment to thoughtful and independent representation of shareholder interests. The following table summarizes certain of our corporate governance best practices and facts about the Board of Directors and the Company:

 

ü 87 of 98 Directors are Independent    ü  

Diverse Board in Terms of Gender, Ethnicity, Experience and Skills

 

ü Lead Independent Director    ü  

Strong Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility

 

ü Annual Board and Committee Self-Assessment    ü  

Policy Providing for Return of Incentive Compensation under Certain Circumstances (“Clawback Policy”)

 

ü 

Directors are Required to Tender Resignation on receiving less than Majority Vote

 

    ü  

Stock Ownership Guidelines for Executives and Directors

 

ü Directors are Required to Tender Resignation on Job Change    ü  

Hedging, Short Sale and Pledging Policies

 

ü 

Independent Directors Meet Without Management Present

 

    ü  

Average Director Tenure of 6.27.4 years

 

ü Robust Shareholder Engagement Practices      

Annual Board Evaluation of Chief Executive Officer

 



BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The following table provides summary information about each member of our Board of Directors, including those who are nominated for election at the Annual Meeting. Detailed information about each Director’s background, skillset and areas of experience can be found beginning on page 13.15.

 

Name Age Director
since
 Occupation and
Experience
 Independent Committee
Memberships
 Other Current Public
Company Boards
Raul Alvarez*+ 60 2012 Executive Chairman and Representative Director at Skylark Co., Ltd.; Former President and COO of McDonald’s Corporation ü Compensation 

•     Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

•     Eli Lilly and Company

•     Realogy Holdings Corp.

Anthony DiNovi* 53 2006 Co-President of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. ü Compensation 

•     West Corporation

Nigel Travis* 66 2009 Chairman and CEO of Dunkin’ Brands     

•     Office Depot, Inc.

Sandra Horbach 55 2006 Managing Director at The Carlyle Group ü 

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 

Compensation

 

•     NBTY, Inc.

•     CVC Brasil Operadora e Agencia de Viagens S.A.

Mark Nunnelly 57 2006 Special Advisor to the Governor and Commissioner of the Department of Revenue, Commonwealth of Massachusetts ü Compensation 

•     Genpact, Inc.

Carl Sparks 48 2013 Former CEO of Travelocity Global ü Audit 

•    Vonage Holdings Corp.

Irene Chang Britt 53 2014 Former President, Pepperidge Farm, a subsidiary of Campbell Soup Company ü Audit 

•    Tailored Brands, Inc.

•    Solazyme, Inc.

Michael Hines 60 2011 Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. ü 

Audit

 

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 

•    GNC Holdings, Inc.

•    The TJX Companies, Inc.

Joseph Uva 60 2011 Senior Advisor to the Chairman, NBCU Telemundo Enterprises ü 

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 

Compensation

  
Name Age Director
since
 Occupation and
Experience
 Independent Committee
Memberships
 Other Current Public
Company Boards
Irene Chang Britt* 54 2014 Former President, Pepperidge Farm, a subsidiary of Campbell Soup Company  

Audit

 

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 

•   TerraVia Holdings, Inc.

•   Tailored Brands, Inc.

Michael Hines* 61 2011 Former Executive Vice President and CFO of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.  

Audit

 

Nominating & Corporate Governance

 

•   GNC Holdings, Inc.

•   The TJX Companies, Inc.

Raul Alvarez+ 61 2012 Chairman of the Board at Skylark Co., Ltd.; Former President and COO of McDonald’s Corporation  Compensation 

•   Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

•   Eli Lilly and Company

•   Realogy Holdings Corp.

Anthony DiNovi 54 2006 Co-President of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.  Compensation 

•   West Corporation

Nigel Travis 67 2009 Chairman and CEO of Dunkin’ Brands     

•   Office Depot, Inc.

Sandra Horbach 56 2006 Managing Director andCo-Head of the US Buyout Group at The Carlyle Group  

Nominating & Corporate Governance

Compensation

 

•   Nature’s Bounty, Inc.

Mark Nunnelly 58 2006 Special Advisor to the Governor and Executive Director of MassIT  Compensation 

•   Genpact, Inc.

Carl Sparks 49 2013 CEO of Academic Partnerships  Audit 

•   Vonage Holdings Corp.

*Nominee

+Lead Independent Director

 



20152016 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Company Performance

 

 

We believe that our named executive officers were instrumental in helping us drive results in 20152016 and in assessing our competitive position and shaping a long-term strategic plan that will best position ourselvesthe Company for continued growth in 20162017 and beyond. For fiscal 2015, we met or exceeded each of our financial performance targets and hadFiscal 2016 was a numberyear of significant operational achievements and strong financial performance, while we also returning more than $725returned approximately $165 million to shareholders in the form of share repurchases and an increased quarterly dividend. Financial and operational highlights of our fiscal 20152016 performance include the following:(1)

 

Increased revenue: Increased revenue to $810.9$828.9 million, an 8.3%a 2.2% increase from 2014;fiscal 2015 or $820.1 million on a52-week basis, a 1.1% increase.

 

Expanded global presencepresence:: Opened 440508 net new Dunkin’ Donuts and 55215 net new Baskin-Robbins locations globally, bringing Dunkin’ Brands to 19,35720,080 total points of distribution as ofyear-end 2015; 2016.

 

Successful Launch of K-Cup pods intoContinued success with the channel business:: Launched Dunkin’ Donuts K-Cup pods into thousands of retail branded products, including Dunkin’ DonutsK-Cups, bagged coffee and online outlets nationwide; from the program’s launch in May 2015 through the endcreamers, each grew faster than their respective categories, indicating an increased share of the year, more than 150 million pods were sold into the grocery channel.market for each product.

 

Leveraged technology to drive resultsresults:: Grew the DD Perks Loyalty Program to 4.3over 6 million members and app downloads toheld our first-ever “Perks Week” promotion in November, during which transactions by members of the program accounted for more than 16 million; successful testing11% of mobile ordering and delivery for Dunkin’ Donuts total U.S.; transactions. In June, we also launched theOn-the-Go ordering platform nationwide. In addition, we successfully launched the Baskin-Robbins mobile app in August.

 

Grew worldwide salessales:: Grew global system-widesystemwide sales by 4.1%6.6% over fiscal 2014;2015, or 5.2% on a52-week basis.

 

Drove positive comparable store sales in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S.:: Increased Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales by 1.4%1.6% and Baskin-Robbins U.S. comparable store sales by 6.1%;0.7%.

 

Increased adjusted earnings per share: Increased diluted adjusted earnings per share by 10.9% to $1.93 versus $1.74 for 2014;

Successful Debt Refinancing: Completed a successful refinancing of our long-term debt at an attractive fixed rate.
Increased earnings per share and adjusted earnings per share(2): Increased diluted earnings per share by 95.4% to $2.11, or 92.6% to $2.08 on a52-week basis, over fiscal 2015; Increased diluted adjusted earnings per share by 17.1% to $2.26, or 15.5% to $2.23 on a52-week basis, over fiscal 2015.

While driving successful 20152016 results, our named executive officers also kept a focus on the long term. While we ended the year within our guidance range, we were not satisfied with the Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales performance particularlyand do not believe that we have yet unleashed the full potential of Dunkin’ Donuts in the second half of 2015.U.S. To address our disappointingimprove comparable store sales growthperformance and with the goal of getting back to positive transaction growth, management designed, based on considerable consumer research, and began executing against a new 5-part6-part strategic growth plan, with the support of the franchisees. The plan is focused on (i) further building our coffee culture by more aggressively pursuing coffee innovation, (ii) improving our innovation process in enhancing core product quality and accelerating our ability to take new products to market, (iii) implementing targeted value and smart pricing, (iv) leading in the use of digital technology, including growing ourbest-in-class loyalty



program, mobile ordering and delivery, and (v) continuing to improve our restaurant experience.experience, and (vi) driving Dunkin’ branded consumer packaged goods into new channels. This plan is designed for the long-term, to drive comparable store sales and traffic for Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and to protect and grow the long-term health and relevancy of the brand.

 

(1)The fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included 53 weeks, as compared to 52 weeks for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015. The impact of the extra week in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 reflects our estimate of the additional week in fiscal 2016 on certain revenues and expenses.
(2)Adjusted earnings per share is anon-GAAP measure calculated using adjusted net income, reflecting net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairments, impairment of joint ventures, and certain other items, net of the tax impact of such adjustments. Please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2017.



HOW PAY IS TIED TO COMPANY PERFORMANCE

Under our executive compensation program, a significant portion of the CEO’s and other Named Executive Officers’ annual total direct compensation is variable based on our operating performance and/or our stock price, as shown below:

 

LOGOLOGO

LOGOLOGO

In 2015 approximately2016, over 81% of our CEO’s compensation and an average of approximately 76%71% of the compensation of our other NEO’s was tied directly to the Company’s operating performance and/or the Company’s stock price.

For more information, see“Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 2016 Compensation” below.

 



CEO Compensation NEO Compensation

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Board structure and committee composition

Our Board of Directors has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating & corporate governance committee with the composition and responsibilities described below. Each committee operates under a written charter approved by our Board of Directors. The members of each committee are appointed by the Board and serve until their successors are elected and qualified, unless they are earlier removed or resign. In addition, from time to time, special committees may be established under the direction of the Board when necessary to address specific issues. While each committee has designated responsibilities, the committees act on behalf of the entire Board. The committees regularly report on their activities to the entire Board.

Our Board of Directors held 5 meetings in fiscal 2015.2016. During fiscal 2015,2016, each director attended at least 75% of the Board meetings and the total meetings held by all of the committees on which he or she served during the periods that he or she served.

During fiscal 2015,2016, the Board had three standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance. The table below provides information about the membership of these committees during fiscal 2015:2016:

 

Name

 Audit Compensation Nominating
& Corporate
Governance
  Audit Compensation Nominating
& Corporate
Governance
 

Raul Alvarez

  X   X 

Irene Chang Britt

 X     X   X

Anthony DiNovi

  X     X  

Michael Hines

 X  X   X  X 

Sandra Horbach

  X   X    X  X 

Mark Nunnelly

  X     X  

Carl Sparks

 X     X   

Nigel Travis

      

Joseph Uva(1)

  X   X  X  X 

Number of meetings during fiscal 2015

 8   6   3  

Number of meetings during fiscal 2016

 7  5  2 

 

 *Chair
(1)Mr. Uva resigned from the Board and each committee on which he served effective June 28, 2016. At that time, Ms. Chang Britt joined the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee as its Chair.

Audit Committee

The purpose of the audit committee is set forth in the audit committee charter. The audit committee’s primary duties and responsibilities are to:

 

Appoint, compensate, retain and oversee the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services and review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent accountants;

Establish procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and (ii) confidential and anonymous submissions by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

Engage independent counsel and other advisers, as necessary;

 

Determine funding of various services provided by accountants or advisers retained by the committee;

 

Review our financial reporting processes and internal controls;

 

Review and approve related-party transactions or recommend related-party transactions for review by independent members of our Board of Directors; and

 

Provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, financial and senior management and the board.

The audit committee consists of Ms. Chang Britt, Mr. Hines and Mr. Sparks. The Board has determined that each member of the audit committee is an independent director pursuant to the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, NASDAQ and all other applicable laws and regulations and that Mr. Hines is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407 of RegulationS-K. Mr. Hines serves as chair of the audit committee. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter under which the audit committee operates. A copy of the charter is available on our website.

Compensation Committee

The purpose of the compensation committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities relating to oversight of the compensation of our directors, executive officers and other employees and the Company’s benefit and equity-based compensation programs. The compensation committee reviews and recommends to our Board of Directors compensation plans, policies and programs and approves specific compensation levels for all executive officers. Under the committee charter, the compensation committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel, or other adviser only after conducting an independence assessment of such advisor as required under NASDAQ rules. The compensation committee consists of Mr. Alvarez, Mr. DiNovi, Ms. Horbach Mr. Nunnelly and Mr. Uva.Nunnelly. Mr. Uva served as a member of the compensation committee prior to his resignation from the Board in June 2016. Mr. Alvarez serves as chair of the compensation committee. The Board has determined that each member of the compensation committee is an independent director as defined under SEC and NASDAQ rules. The compensation committee met six times in fiscal 2015. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter under which the compensation committee operates. A copy of the charter is available on our website.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

The purpose of the nominating & corporate governance committee is to identify individuals qualified to become members of the Board of Directors, to recommend director nominees for each annual meeting of shareholders, to recommend nominees for election to fill any vacancies on the Board of Directors, and to address related matters. The nominating & corporate governance committee reviews

and recommends to the Board of Directors any required changes to the corporate governance principles applicable to the Company and is responsible for leading the annual review of the Board’s performance. The nominating & corporate governance committee consists of Ms. Horbach,Chang Britt, Mr. Hines, and Mr. Uva. Mr. Uva servesMs. Horbach. Ms. Chang Britt was appointed as a member and the chair of the nominating & corporate governance committee.committee in June 2016, replacing Mr. Uva. The Board has determined that each member of the nominating & corporate governance committee is an independent director as defined under NASDAQ rules. The nominating & corporate governance committee met three times in fiscal 2015. Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter under which the nominating & corporate governance committee operates. A copy of the charter is available on our website.

Our Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to Dunkin’ Brands. The Board has oversight responsibility for the systems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to Dunkin’ Brands. The Board believes that evaluating the executive team’s management of the various risks confronting Dunkin’ Brands is one of its most important areas of oversight.

In accordance with this responsibility, the Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports to the Board at Board meetings. The Board reviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans, major litigation and other matters that may present material risks to the Company’s operations, plans, prospects or the Company’s or either of our brands’ reputation, acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning. The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, regulatory compliance, compliance with orders and data security. The Compensation Committee reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of compensation programs, plans and arrangements.

Compensation of Directors

Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

We designed ournon-employee director compensation program with input from the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer, to provide compensation levels at the median of our peer group then used for compensation purposes. Under ournon-employee director compensation program, each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee of the Company is eligible to receive compensation for his or her service as a director. In fiscal 2015, the Compensation Committee requested that its independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer, undertake a competitive analysis of our director compensation program and review the compensation provided to our non-employeeNon-employee directors against compensation paid by companies in the Company’s peer group, as further described in the “Executive Compensation” section of this proxy statement. After reviewing this analysis and noting that the Company’s compensation program for non-employee directors was below market as compared to the peer group, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approvedreceive an increase in the total compensation to be paid to non-employee directors, effective May 2015. Under the revised program, the annual board retainer, inclusive of meeting fees, remained unchanged atof $70,000. The Lead Director’sDirector receives an additional annual retainer was increased to $25,000 from $20,000, while the cash retainers for all committee chairs remain unchanged after the review.of $25,000. The chair of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $15,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $12,500 and the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional annual retainer of $7,500. In addition to cash retainers,non-employee directors receive an annual grant of restricted stock units. After consideringunits, the analysis of Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved an increase in the grant date fair market value of the annual grant of restricted stock units fromwhich is approximately $85,000 in 2014 to approximately $110,000 in 2015.$110,000. These restricted stock units become fully vested on the first anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service through the vesting date. WithIn addition, the revisions to the program, the totalBoard may approve additional compensation offor ournon-employee directors approximates the median total compensation paid to non-employee directors in recognition of significant additional responsibilities undertaken by the director, as it did for Ms. Chang Britt during our peer group, based on the Pearl Meyer analysis.2016 fiscal year, as described below.

We maintain twonon-qualified deferred compensation plans: the Dunkin’ BrandsNon-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQDC Plan I”) and the Dunkin’ Brands, Inc.Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan II (the “NQDC Plan II”), which we refer to collectively as the “Deferred Compensation Plan”. The NQDC Plan II replaced the NQDC Plan I effective as of January 1, 2015 with respect to deferrals made after that date. Under the Deferred Compensation Plan, anon-employee director may elect to defer all or part of the cash we would otherwise pay him or her and/or the shares of our common stock he or she would otherwise receive upon settlement of his or her restricted stock units. Amounts deferred by anon-employee director under the Deferred Compensation Plan are credited to a deferred stock unit account, which is credited with dividend equivalents upon the payment of any dividends by us to our shareholders. All amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan are only distributable upon the termination of thenon-employee director’s board service. During fiscal 2015,2016, Messrs. Alvarez, DiNovi, NunnellyHines and Sparks and Mss. Chang Britt and Horbach elected to defer cash and/or restricted stock unit awards under the Deferred Compensation Plan.

Director Compensation for 20152016

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by ournon-employee directors during our 20152016 fiscal year. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive any fees for their service as directors. Mr. Travis’s compensation is included with that of our other named executive officers below in “Executive Compensation.”

 

Name

  Fees Earned Or Paid
In Cash (1)
   Stock Awards
(2)
   Total   Fees Earned Or Paid
In Cash (1)
   Stock Awards
(2)
   Total 

Raul Alvarez (3)

  $                    105,673            $            107,691            $            213,364            $                    107,500           $            110,029           $            217,529         

Irene Chang Britt(4)

  $70,000            $107,691            $177,691            $103,791           $110,029           $213,820         

Anthony DiNovi

  $70,000            $107,691            $177,691            $70,000           $110,029           $180,029         

Michael Hines (4)(5)

  $85,000            $107,691            $192,691            $85,000           $110,029           $195,029         

Sandra Horbach

  $70,000            $107,691            $177,691            $70,000           $110,029           $180,029         

Mark Nunnelly

  $70,000            $107,691            $177,691            $70,000           $110,029           $180,029         

Carl Sparks

  $70,000            $107,691            $177,691            $70,000           $110,029           $180,029         

Joseph Uva (5)(6)

  $77,500            $107,691            $185,191            $38,324           $110,029           $148,353         

 

(1)All cash retainer payments are made quarterly in arrears. Amounts shown in this table are not reduced to reflect the director’s election, if any, to defer receipt of his or her cash retainer payments under the Deferred Compensation Plan.
(2)Reflects the grant date fair value of restricted stock units granted tonon-employee directors as determined under FASB ASC Topic 718, disregarding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value of each award received was calculated by multiplying the number of restricted stock units granted to the director by the accounting value of each restricted stock unit in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. This value is marginally lower than the share price on the date of grant and reflects a discount related to the fact that the units do not earn dividends until they vest. These grantsamounts represent the value of the annual equity award we granted to ournon-employee directors in accordance with ournon-employee director compensation program described above, and reflect rounding up in the number of restricted stock units granted to avoid the grant of fractional units. As of December 26, 2015,31, 2016, each of ournon-employee directors who were then serving on the Board of Directors held 2,1282,484 restricted stock unit awards that will vest on May 11, 2016,2017, subject to continued service on the Board.Board through the vesting date. None of ournon-employee directors held any other stock awards or held any stock options as of December 26, 2015.31, 2016.
(3)Includes annual cash retainer payments of $70,000 for board service, $12,500 as compensation for Mr. Alvarez’s role as Compensation Committee Chair and $23,173$25,000 as compensation for his role as Lead Director. Mr. Alvarez’s compensation as Lead Director reflects the pro rata 2015 increase from $20,000 per year to $25,000 per year described above.
(4)In 2016, Ms. Chang Britt performed significant work on behalf of the Board relating to the Company’s long-term strategic planning. In recognition of the substantial time and effort expended by Ms. Chang Britt on this project, the Board approved aone-time payment to her in the amount of $30,000. The amount of fees earned or paid in cash shown for her includes her annual cash retainer payment of $70,000 for Board service, the $30,000one-time payment and $3,791 aspro-rata compensation for her role as Nominating and Corporate Governance chair, which she assumed on June 28, 2016.
(5)Includes annual cash retainer payments of $70,000 for Board service and $15,000 as compensation for Mr. Hines’ role as Audit Committee Chair.
(5)(6)IncludesMr. Uva resigned from the Board of Directors effective June 28, 2016. Amounts shown includepro-rata annual cash retainer payments of $70,000$34,615 for Board service and $7,500$3,709 as compensation for Mr. Uva’s role as Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair. Due to Mr. Uva’s resignation, his restricted stock unit award for 2016 was forfeited and did not vest.

Director Ownership Guidelines

Under our director ownership guidelines, eachnon-employee director is expected to own shares of our common stock in an amount equal to five times the director’s annual cash retainer. Each director is expected to reach this ownership level within five years of first becoming a director or first being designated as an independent director. “Ownership” for this purpose includes shares owned directly as well as share equivalents, including shares credited to anon-employee director’s stock unit account under the Deferred Compensation Plan. As of the end of our fiscal year, Messrs. Alvarez, DiNovi, Hines and Uva, and Ms. Horbacheach of ournon-employee directors had met the director ownership guideline.guidelines.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Dunkin’ Brands has a classified Board of Directors currently consisting of three Directors with terms expiring in 2016 (Class II), threetwo Directors with terms expiring in 2017 (Class III), three Directors with terms expiring in 2018 (Class I) and three Directors with terms expiring in 2018 (Class I)II). At each Annual Meeting of Shareholders, Directors in one class are elected for a full term of three years to succeed those Directors whose terms are expiring. This year, the threetwo Class IIIII Director nominees will stand for election to a three-year term expiring at the 20192020 Annual Meeting. The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote to elect Raul Alvarez, Anthony DiNoviMichael Hines and Nigel TravisIrene Chang Britt as Directors unless the proxy is marked otherwise. Each of the nominees has indicated his or her willingness to serve, if elected. However, if a nominee should be unable to serve, the shares of common stock represented by proxies may be voted for a substitute nominee designated by the Board. Management has no reason to believe that any of the above-mentioned persons will not serve his or her term as a Director.

We seek nominees with established strong professional reputations, sophistication and experience in the retail and consumer industries. We also seek nominees with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business such as international operations; marketing and brand management; sales, buying and distribution; accounting, finance and capital structure; strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; technology and social and digital media; human resources and development practices; and strategy and innovation. Our nominees hold or have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizations or in businesses related to important substantive areas, and in these positions have also gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. Our nominees also have experience serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public companies, and each of our nominees has an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends.

In addition, allboth of our nominees have prior service on our Board, which has provided them with significant exposure to both our business and the industry in which we compete. We believe that allboth of our nominees possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for boardBoard service, and we have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each director in the individual biographies below.

Nominees for Election for Terms Expiring in 20192020 (Class IIIII Directors)

The individuals listed below have been nominated and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 20192020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. Each of these nomineesMr. Hines was previously elected to the board by shareholders. Ms. Chang Britt was appointed by the Board of Directors in May 2014.

Your Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the election

of each of the nominees as director.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2016 (Class II Directors)

Raul Alvarez, 60

Director since 2012

Mr. Alvarez is currently Executive Chairman and Representative Director at Skylark Co., Ltd., a Japanese-based operator of restaurant chains. Mr. Alvarez is a director at Lowe’s Companies, Inc., Eli

Lilly and Company and Realogy Holdings Corp. and served as a director of McDonald’s Corporation and KeyCorp until 2009. Mr. Alvarez served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald’s Corporation from August 2006 until December 2009. Previously, he served as President of McDonald’s North America from January 2005 to August 2006 and as President of McDonald’s USA from July 2004 to January 2005. Mr. Alvarez brings significant experience in the quick service restaurant industry as well as executive leadership experience to the Board.

Anthony DiNovi, 53

Director since 2006

Mr. DiNovi is Co-President of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. Mr. DiNovi joined THL in 1988. Mr. DiNovi is currently a director of West Corporation. Mr. DiNovi was selected as a director because of his experience addressing financial, strategic and operating issues as a senior executive of a financial services firm and as a director of several companies in various industries.

Nigel Travis, 66

Director since 2009

Mr. Travis has served as Chief Executive Officer of Dunkin’ Brands since January 2009 and assumed the additional role of Chairman of the Board in May 2013. From 2005 through 2008, Mr. Travis served as President and Chief Executive Officer, and on the board of directors of Papa John’s International, Inc., a publicly-traded international pizza chain. Prior to Papa John’s, Mr. Travis was with Blockbuster, Inc. from 1994 to 2004, where he served in increasing roles of responsibility, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Travis previously held numerous senior positions at Burger King Corporation. Mr. Travis currently serves as the Lead Director of Office Depot, Inc. and formerly served on the boards of Lorillard, Inc. and Bombay Company, Inc. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Travis brings to the board a deep understanding of the Company, as well as domestic and international experience with franchised businesses in the quick service restaurant and retail industries.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2017 (Class III Directors)

Michael Hines, 6061

Director since 2011

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions

with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP. Mr. Hines is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc. and of The TJX Companies, Inc. Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry, including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management and financial management.

Joseph Uva, 60

Director since 2011

Mr. Uva is Senior Advisor to the Chairman of NBCU Telemundo Enterprises. From April 2013 through September 2015, Mr. Uva was Chairman of Hispanic Enterprises and Content for NBC Universal. Mr. Uva previously worked as an independent consultant in the media and communications

industry from 2011 to 2013, and prior to that, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Univision Communications, Inc., a Spanish language media company, from April 2007 through March 2011. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Uva was President and Chief Executive Officer of OMD Worldwide Group, a subsidiary of Omnicom Media Group Holdings, Inc., a media communications firm. Mr. Uva served as a director of Univision Communications, Inc. from 2007 until March 2011 and as a director of TiVo Inc. from 2004 through July 2011. Mr. Uva brings extensive executive experience and knowledge of media and advertising, as well as service on the boards of other public companies, to the Board.

Irene Chang Britt, 5354

Director since 2014

Ms. Chang Britt served as President, Pepperidge Farm, a subsidiary of Campbell Soup Company from August 2012 to February 2015 and also held the position of Senior Vice President, Global Baking and Snacking for Campbell from October 2010 to February 2015. Ms. Chang Britt joined Campbell in 2005 and held a series of leadership positions with Campbell including Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer and President, North America Foodservice. Ms. Chang Britt currently serves on the board of directors of Tailored Brands, Inc. and Solazyme,TerraVia Holdings, Inc., and formerly served on the board of Sunoco, Inc. Ms. Chang Britt brings to the Board a deep knowledge of the consumer packaged goods category, and extensive executive experience.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2018 (Class I Directors)

Sandra Horbach, 5556

Director since 2006

Ms. Horbach is a Managing Director of The Carlyle Group, where she serves as headCo-Head of the Global Consumer and Retail team.US Buyout Group. Ms. Horbach currently serves as a director of Acosta Sales & Marketing, NBTY,Nature’s Bounty, Inc., CVC Brasil Operadora e Agência de Viagens S.A. and Vogue InternationalNovolex as well as a number ofnot-for-profit organizations. Prior to joining Carlyle, Ms. Horbach was a General Partner at Forstmann Little, a private investment firm, and an Associate at Morgan Stanley. She has also served on the boards of Beats, philosophy, Vogue, CVC, Citadel Broadcasting Corporation and The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. Ms. Horbach has extensive experience in the retail and consumer industries, and experience on other public and private boards.

Mark Nunnelly, 5758

Director since 2006

Mr. Nunnelly currently serves as Special Advisor to the Governor and Executive Director of MassIT, the Massachusetts Office of Information Technology. Previously, Mr. Nunnelly was Commissioner of the Department of Revenue for The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and previouslyprior to that was a Managing Director at Bain Capital Partners, LLC (“Bain Capital”) until 2014. Prior to joining Bain Capital in 1989, Mr. Nunnelly was a Partner at Bain & Company, with experience in the domestic, Asian and European strategy practices. Previously, Mr. Nunnelly worked at Procter & Gamble in product management. Mr. Nunnelly serves on the boardsboard of directors of Genpact, Inc., as well as severalnot-for-profit corporations, and formerly served on numerous public and private boards, including Domino’s Pizza, Inc., Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. and Warner Music Group Corp. Mr. Nunnelly brings significant experience in product and brand management, as well as service on the boards of other public companies, including companies in the quick service restaurant business, to the Board.

Carl Sparks, 4849

Director since 2013

Mr. Sparks most recentlyserves as Chief Executive Officer of Academic Partnerships, a role he has held since April 2016. Academic Partnerships is one of the leading companies in helping public universities migrate to online student recruitment and course delivery. Prior to this role, Mr. Sparks served as the Chief Executive Officer of Travelocity Global, one of the leading companies in online travel, and a division of Sabre Inc., from April 2011 through April 2014. Prior to joining Travelocity, he served as President of Gilt Groupe, an invitation-only online retailer of luxury products and experiences. Mr. Sparks joined Gilt as Chief Marketing Officer in October 2009 and was promoted to President in March 2010, serving in that role until April 2011, when he joined Travelocity. Mr. Sparks also served for five years at Expedia Inc., an online travel company, from June 2004 until October 2009, in a variety of leadership roles, including Senior Vice President, Marketing and Retail Operations at Hotels.com from June 2004 to May 2006, Chief Marketing Officer at Expedia.com from June 2006 to December 2007, and General Manager at Hotels.com USA, Latin America & Canada from January 2008 to October 2009. Mr. Sparks is also a director of Vonage Holdings Corp. Mr. Sparks brings expertise in digital marketing, brand management, as well as executive experience, to the Board.

Directors with Terms Expiring in 2019 (Class II Directors)

Raul Alvarez, 61

Director since 2012

Mr. Alvarez is currently Chairman of the Board at Skylark Co., Ltd., a Japanese-based operator of restaurant chains. Mr. Alvarez is a director at Lowe’s Companies, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company and Realogy Holdings Corp. and served as a director of McDonald’s Corporation and KeyCorp until 2009. Mr. Alvarez served as President and Chief Operating Officer of McDonald’s Corporation from August 2006 until December 2009. Previously, he served as President of McDonald’s North America from January 2005 to August 2006 and as President of McDonald’s USA from July 2004 to January 2005. Mr. Alvarez brings significant experience in the quick service restaurant industry as well as executive leadership experience to the Board.

Anthony DiNovi, 54

Director since 2006

Mr. DiNovi isCo-President of Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. Mr. DiNovi joined THL in 1988. Mr. DiNovi is currently a director of West Corporation. Mr. DiNovi was selected as a director because of his experience addressing financial, strategic and operating issues as a senior executive of a financial services firm and as a director of several companies in various industries.

Nigel Travis, 67

Director since 2009

Mr. Travis has served as Chief Executive Officer of Dunkin’ Brands since January 2009 and assumed the additional role of Chairman of the Board in May 2013. From 2005 through 2008, Mr. Travis served as President and Chief Executive Officer, and on the board of directors of Papa John’s International, Inc., a publicly-traded international pizza chain. Prior to Papa John’s, Mr. Travis was with Blockbuster, Inc. from 1994 to 2004, where he served in increasing roles of responsibility, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Travis previously held numerous senior positions at Burger King Corporation. Mr. Travis currently serves as a director of Office Depot, Inc. and formerly served on the

boards of Lorillard, Inc. and Bombay Company, Inc. As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Travis brings to the board a deep understanding of the Company, as well as domestic and international experience with franchised businesses in the quick service restaurant and retail industries.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Independence. The Board evaluates any relationships of each director and nominee with Dunkin’ Brands and makes an affirmative determination whether or not such director or nominee is independent. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, an “independent” director is one who meets the qualification requirements for being an independent director under applicable laws and the corporate governance listing standards of NASDAQ. Our Board reviews any transactions and relationships between eachnon-management director or any member of his or her immediate family and Dunkin’ Brands. The purpose of this review is to determine whether there were any such relationships or transactions and, if so, whether they were inconsistent with a determination that the director was independent. As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that each current member of our Board of Directors, with the exception of Mr. Travis, our Chief Executive Officer, is independent under the governance and listing standards of NASDAQ.

Board Expertise and Diversity. We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender and ethnicity/race, but we do not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. We also seek a Board that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. All of our directors are financially literate, and one member of our Audit Committee is an audit committee financial expert.

Board Annual Performance Reviews. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board shall be responsible for periodically, and at least annually, conducting a self-evaluation of the Board as a whole. In addition, the written charters of the Audit Committee, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee provide that each such committee shall evaluate its performance on an annual basis using criteria that it has developed and shall report to the Board on its findings.

Board Nominees. Under its charter, our Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board candidates to stand for election to the Board at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders and for recommending candidates to fill vacancies on the Board that may occur between annual meetings of shareholders. The Corporate Governance Guidelines

provide that nominees for director shall be selected on the basis of their character, wisdom, judgment, ability to make independent analytical inquiries, business experiences, understanding of the Company’s industry and business environment, time commitment and acumen. Board members are expected to become and remain informed about the Company, its business and its industry and rigorously prepare for, attend and participate in all Board and applicable committee meetings. The committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience. In addition, the committee considers, in light of our business, each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that are identified in the biographical information contained under “Proposal 1—Election of Directors.”

The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee considers properly submitted recommendations for candidates to the Board of Directors from shareholders. Any shareholder may submit in writing one

candidate for consideration for each shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected by not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to shareholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. Any shareholder recommendations for consideration by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee should include the candidate’s name, biographical information, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and Dunkin’ Brands within the last three years, a statement of recommendation of the candidate from the shareholder, a description of our shares beneficially owned by the shareholder, a description of all arrangements between the candidate and the recommending shareholder and any other person pursuant to which the candidate is being recommended, a written indication of the candidate’s willingness to serve on the Board of Directors, any other information required to be provided under securities laws and regulations, and a written indication of willingness to provide such other information as the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee may reasonably request. Recommendations should be sent to Rich Emmett, Corporate Secretary, Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., 130 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by shareholders or others in the same manner as candidates from other sources. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Board Leadership Structure. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Board may select a Chairman of the Board of Directors at any time, who may also be an executive officer of the Company. Jon Luther, our formernon-executive Chairman, retired from the Board of Directors in May 2013. At that time, the Board appointed Nigel Travis, our Chief Executive Officer, to the additional role of Chairman of the Board and named Raul Alvarez as Lead Independent Director. Mr. Travis has been our Chief Executive Officer since 2009 and has significant prior experience with franchised businesses in the quick service restaurant and retail industries. Given Mr. Travis’ extensive experience and deep knowledge of our company and our industry, the Board believes that combining the chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer positions is currently the most effective leadership structure for Dunkin’ Brands. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Travis is intimately involved in theday-to-day operations of our company and is best positioned to lead the Board in setting the strategic focus and direction for our company. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Alvarez has the power to provide formal input into boardBoard meeting agendas, to call meetings of the independent directors, and to preside at meetings of independent directors, as well as playing a key role in management and succession planning. The Board believes that the combination of the chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer roles as part of a governance structure

that includes a lead independent director, as well as the exercise of key boardBoard oversight responsibilities by independent directors, provides an effective balance for the management of the Company in the best interest of our shareholders.

Majority Voting Guidelines. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation following certification of the shareholder vote. The Nominating & Governance Committee shall make a recommendation to the Board and the Board shall determine whether or not to accept such resignation within a period of 90 days following the shareholder vote, and will promptly publicly disclose its decision to accept or reject the resignation and, if rejected, the reasons for doing so.

Policies Relating to Directors. It is our policy that when a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, that director shall tender his or her

resignation from the Board to the Chairman of the Board, with a copy to the Secretary, and the Board shall determine whether or not to accept such resignation. In addition, it is our policy that no director shall be nominated who has attained the age of 73 prior to or on the date of his or her election orre-election. We expect each of our directors to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, and in 2015, eight2016, each of our directors did attend.

Code of Business Ethics and Conduct. We have adopted a written Code of Business Ethics and Conduct (the “Code”“Code of Conduct”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our executive officers, and is designed to ensure that our business is conducted with integrity. The Code of Conduct covers professional conduct, conflicts of interest, intellectual property and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. A copy of the Code of Conduct is posted on our website, which is located athttp://investor.dunkinbrands.com. We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Conduct for Dunkin’ Brands executive officers within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website posting or by filing a Current Report onForm 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Corporate Social Responsibility. At Dunkin’ Brands, we believe that being a socially responsible company is good business. We strive to be recognized as a company that responsibly serves our guests, franchisees, employees, communities, business partners and the interests of our planet. Our commitment to corporate social responsibility is defined by four priorities:

 

Our People. From our employees to our franchisees and crew members, we believe in treating everyone with respect and fairness.

 

Our Guests. We are passionate about offering our guests delicious products they will enjoy, giving them plenty of menu options, and providing accurate nutrition information so they can make the best choices for themselves.

 

Our Planet. We recognize that everything we do has an impact on the environment. From the materials we use, to the way we construct and operate our stores, to the products we source, we are committed to adopting better, more sustainable approaches whenever feasible.

 

Our Neighborhoods. We are dedicatedTogether with our franchisees, the Joy In Childhood Foundation provides the simple joys of childhood to servingsick and hungry kids. Since 2006, the basic needsfoundation (formerly the Dunkin’ Donuts & Baskin-Robbins Community Foundation) has been deeply embedded in communities across the country and has donated more than $11 million to hundreds of ournational and local communities—from providing food for the hungry and support for children’s health and wellness, to ensuring our neighborhoods are safe and secure.charities.

In Spring 2015, Dunkin’ Brands published our thirdBrands’ Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) report,Serving Responsibly, in which we demonstrate the progress we have made toward goals outlined in our 2010 and 2012 reports, review the challenges we encountered and set forth new goals. The scope of the report includes corporate functions and North American facilities owned and operated by Dunkin’ Brands or our subsidiaries for the years 2013-2014, along with some highlights from our franchise restaurants and our international business. We are reporting on a two-year cycle. Our previous CSR reports are available on our website atwww.dunkinbrands.com/responsibility.,provide an overview of our CSR goals and progress since 2010. We are reporting on atwo-year cycle and our next CSR Report will be published in the spring of 2017.

Shareholder Engagement.We have a strong shareholder engagement program and value shareholder input. We have regular, transparent communication with our shareholders throughout the year to ensure we are addressing their questions and concerns. We engage with shareholders through our quarterly earnings calls, investment community conferences, road shows and other communications channels. In 2015, our management team met with representatives at many of our top institutional shareholders representing an aggregate of approximately 50% of our outstanding shares.

Communications with Directors. Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the Board or the independent directors as a group, or specified individual directors by writing to such individual or group c/o Office of the Corporate Secretary, Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., 130 Royall Street, Canton, Massachusetts 02021. The Secretary will forward such communications to the relevant group or individual at or prior to the next meeting of the Board.

Online Availability of InformationInformation.. The current versions of our Certificate of Incorporation,By-Laws, Corporate Governance Principles,Guidelines, Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, and charters for our Audit, Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website athttp://investor.dunkinbrands.com.

Transactions with Related Persons

Under the Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, the Board is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which Dunkin’ Brands and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, 5% or greater shareholders or their immediate family members are participants and in which such persons have a direct or indirect material interest as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Board considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for Dunkin’ Brands entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Board may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Board.

Stock Ownership Information

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the record date, March 17, 201616, 2017 by (i) such persons known to us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each director, director nominee and named executive officer, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the address for each individual is c/o Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. 130 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021.

 

Name

  Number of
Shares (1)
   Percentage   Number of
Shares (1)
   Percentage 

Beneficial holders of 5% or more of our outstanding coming stock:

        

FMR, LLC (2)

   9,582,516     10.5

Janus Capital Management LLC (3)

   8,012,771     8.8

BlackRock, Inc. (4)

   6,345,037     6.9

The Vanguard Group (5)

   6,281,479     6.9

Wellington Management Group LLP (6)

   5,204,850     5.7

Morgan Stanley (7)

   4,877,376     5.3

Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limited (8)

   4,851,161     5.3

Janus Capital Management LLC (2)

   9,242,756    10.0

FMR, LLC (3)

   8,199,903    8.9

The Vanguard Group (4)

   6,844,913    7.4

BlackRock, Inc. (5)

   6,834,296    7.4

Meritage Group LP (6)

   4,778,484    5.2

Directors and executive officers:

        

Nigel Travis

   1,550,126     1.7   1,634,610    1.7

Paul Carbone

   188,769     *     277,226    * 

John Costello

   183,482     *  

David Hoffmann

   —      * 

Paul Twohig

   182,341     *     263,041    * 

William Mitchell

   112,551     *     215,206    * 

Raul Alvarez

   8,709     *     11,193    * 

Irene Chang Britt

   3,977     *     6,461    * 

Anthony DiNovi

   6,970     *     9,454    * 

Sandra Horbach

   6,970     *     9,454    * 

Michael Hines

   12,455     *     14,939    * 

Mark Nunnelly

   6,970     *     9,454    * 

Carl Sparks

   5,590     *     8,074    * 

Joseph Uva

   10,611     *  

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (17 persons)

   2,654,842     2.9   2,933,167    3.1

 

 

*Indicates less than 1%
(1)Reflects sole voting and investment power except as indicated in footnotes below. Includes shares of common stock which the following person had the right to acquire on March 17, 201616, 2017 or within sixty (60) days thereafter through the exercise of stock options: Mr. Travis (1,275,749)(1,359,712), Mr. Carbone (166,176), Mr. Costello (132,690)(256,125), Mr. Twohig (174,487)(247,725), Mr. Mitchell (131,379)(209,839) and all directors and executive officers as a group (2,283,030)(2,508,630). Includes shares of restricted common stock or restricted stock units subject to vesting conditions: Mr. Travis (150,000), Mr. Carbone (21,101), Mr. Costello (27,096), Mr. Alvarez (2,128)(2,484), Ms. Chang Britt (2,128)(2,484), Mr. DiNovi (2,128)(2,484), Ms. Horbach (2,128)(2,484), Mr. Hines (2,128)(2,484), Mr. Nunnelly (2,128)(2,484), Mr. Sparks (2,128)(2,484), Mr. Uva (2,128) and all directors and executive officers as a group (215,221)(188,489). Mr. Hoffmann was granted certain equity awards in connection with his hiring in October 2016, as described elsewhere in this proxy statement, but as of March 16, 2017, such equity awards had not yet vested and Mr. Hoffmann was not yet deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares under such awards.
(2)The information regarding Janus Capital Management LLC (“Janus”) is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 1 to its Schedule 13G filed by Janus with the SEC on February 10, 2017, which reflects sole voting and dispositive power as to 9,242,756 shares and shared voting and dispositive power as to 102,600 shares. Janus reported its address as 151 Detroit Street, Denver, Colorado 80206.
(3)The information regarding FMR LLC is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 89 to its Schedule 13G filed by FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson with the SEC on February 10, 2016,14, 2017, which reflects sole voting power as to 1,086,3861,443,463 shares and sole dispositive power as to 9,582,5168,199,903 shares by FMR LLC and shared voting and dispositive power as to 9,582,5168,199,903 shares by Abigail P. Johnson. Abigail P. Johnson is a Director, the Vice Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and the President of FMR LLC. FMR LLC and Abigail P. Johnson reported their address as 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

(3)(4)The information regarding Janus Capital Management LLCThe Vanguard Group (“Janus”Vanguard”) is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 3 to its Schedule 13G filed by JanusVanguard with the SEC on February 16, 2016,9, 2017, which reflects sole voting andpower as to 53,483 shares, shared voting power as to 10,399 shares, sole dispositive power as to 7,929,5716,785,631 shares, and shared voting and dispositive power as to 83,20059,282 shares. JanusVanguard reported its address as 151 Detroit Street, Denver, Colorado 80206.100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(4)(5)The information regarding BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 1 to its Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock with the SEC on February 9, 2016,January 23, 2017, which reflects sole voting power as to 6,018,4636,463,608 shares and sole dispositive power as to 6,345,0376,816,737 shares, and shared voting and dispositive power as to 17,559 shares. BlackRock reported its address as 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(5)(6)The information regarding The VanguardMeritage Group LP (“Vanguard”Meritage”) is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 21 to its Schedule 13G filed by VanguardMeritage with the SEC on February 11, 2016, which reflects sole voting power as to 69,095 shares, shared voting power as to 5,000 shares, sole dispositive power as to 6,213,184 shares,13, 2017, filed jointly with MWG GP LLC (“MWG”) and shared dispositive power as to 68,295 shares. Vanguard reported its address as 100 Vanguard Blvd.Meritage Fund LLC (“Meritage Fund”), Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(6)The information regarding Wellington Management Group LLP, Wellington Group Holdings LLP and Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (collectively, “Wellington”) is based solely on information included in its Schedule 13G filed by Wellington with the SEC on February 11, 2016, which reflects shared voting power as to 2,914,766 shares and shared dispositive power as to 5,204,850 shares. Wellington reported that the securities being reporting on are owned of record by clients of one or more investment advisers directly or indirectly owned by Wellington Management Group LLP and that those clients have the right to receive, or the power to direct receipt of, dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of, such securities. Wellington reported its address as c/o Wellington Management Company LLP, 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.
(7)The information regarding Morgan Stanley is based solely on information included in Amendment No. 4 to its Schedule 13G filed by Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. with the SEC on February 11, 2016, which reflects sole voting power as to 4,876,760 shares, shared voting power as to 612 shares, sole dispositive power as to zero shares and shared dispositive power as to 4,877,376 shares by each of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. Morgan Stanley reported that the securities being reported on by Morgan Stanley as a parent holding company are owned, or may be deemed to be beneficially owned, by Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc., an investment adviser in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) as amended. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley reported its address as 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036 and Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. reported its address as 522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036.
(8)The information regarding Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limited, Tybourne Capital Management Limited, Tybourne Kesari Limited and Viswanathan Krishnan (collectively, “Tybourne”) is based solely on information included in its Schedule 13G filed by Tybourne with the SEC on February 16, 2016, which reflects shared voting and dispositive power as to all 4,851,161 shares. Tybourne reports that the statement relates to securities heldof 4,778,484 shares for the account of Tybourne Equity Master Fund (“Tybourne Master Fund”). Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limited serves as the investment advisor to Tybourne Master Fund. Tybourne Capital Management Limited serves as the manager to Tybourne Master FundMeritage and the parent of Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limited. Tybourne Kesari Limited is the parent of Tybourne Capital Management Limited. Mr. Krishnan is the principalMWG, and sole shareholder of Tybourne Kesari Limited. In such capacities, Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limited, Tybourne Capital Management Limited, Tybourne Kesari Limited and Mr. Krishnan may be deemed to haveshared voting and dispositive power over securities heldas to 4,692,741 shares for Meritage Fund. Meritage reports the Tybourne Master Fund. Tybourne Capital Management (HK) Limitedaddress of Meritage, MWG and Mr. Krishnan reported their addressMeritage Fund as 2302 Cheung Kong Center, 2 Queen’s Road Central, Hong Kong, and Tybourne Capital Management Limited and Tybourne Kesari Limited reported their address as 190 Elgin Avenue, George Town, Grand Cayman KY1-9005, Cayman Islands.One Ferry Building, Suite 375, San Francisco, California 94111.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors, executive officers and any greater than 10% beneficial owners to file reports of holdings and transactions in our common stock with the SEC. To facilitate compliance, we have undertaken the responsibility to prepare and file these reports on behalf of our officers and directors. Based on our records and other information, all reports were timely filed during fiscal year 2015.2016.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section discusses the principles underlying our policies and decisions used to determine the compensation of our executive officers who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” as well as the most important factors relevant to an analysis of those policies and decisions. Our “named executive officers” for fiscal 20152016 are:

 

Nigel Travis, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

Paul Carbone, Chief Financial Officer
Paul Carbone, Chief Financial Officer(1)

David Hoffmann, President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada(2)

 

Paul Twohig, Former President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada

 

John Costello, President, Global Marketing and Innovation

William Mitchell, President, International

(1)As previously publicly announced by the Company on March 23, 2017, Mr. Carbone has tendered his resignation from the Company, effective April 21, 2017. For more information, please see the Company’s Current Report on Form8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017.
(2)In connection with Mr. Twohig’s previously announced retirement, Mr. Hoffmann was hired to assume the role of President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada, effective as of October 3, 2016.

Overview of compensation and fiscal 20152016 performance

Our compensation strategy focuses on providing a total compensation package that will attract and retain high-caliber executive officers and employees, incentivize them to achieve company and individual performance goals, and align management, employee and shareholder interests over both the short-term and long-term. Our approach to executive compensation reflects our focus on long-term value creation. We believe that by placing a significant equity opportunity in the hands of executives who are capable of driving and sustaining growth, our shareholders will benefit along with the executives who helped create this value.

Compensation philosophy

Our compensation philosophy centers upon:

 

attracting and retaining industry-leading talent by targeting compensation levels that are competitive when measured against other companies within our industry;

 

linking compensation actually paid to the achievement of our financial, operating and strategic goals;

 

rewarding individual performance and contribution to our success; and

 

aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders by delivering a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation through equity-based awards with a long-term value horizon.

Each of the key elements of our executive compensation program is discussed in more detail below. OurThe elements of our executive compensation program is designedare intended to be complementary and to collectively serve the compensation objectives described above. We have not adopted any formal

policies or guidelines for allocating compensation between short-term and long-term compensation, between cash andnon-cash compensation, or among different forms of cash andnon-cash compensation. The compensation levels of our named executive officers reflect, to a significant degree, the varying roles and responsibilities of these executives.

At our 20152016 annual meeting of shareholders, approximately 99%89% of the votes cast on our “say on pay” proposal were in favor of the compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee considered this positive support for our compensation practices and continued to make its compensation-related decisions consistent with the Company’s stated executive compensation philosophy.

Our compensation and governance practices

Described below are some of the practices that we consider good governance features of our executive compensation program.

Risk Mitigation -Our executive compensation program includes a number of controls that mitigate risk, including executive stock ownership and holding requirements and our ability to recover compensation paid to executives in certain circumstances, each as described below.

Robust Shareholder Engagement -We have regular, transparent communication with our shareholders throughout the year to ensure we are addressing their questions and concerns. We engage with shareholders through our quarterly earnings calls, investment community conferences, road shows and other communications channels. In 2015,2016, our management team met with representatives at many of our top institutional shareholders representing an aggregate of approximately 50% of our outstanding shares.

Compensation Clawback -Under our Incentive Compensation Recoupment policy, we can recover cash- or equity-based compensation paid to executives in various circumstances, including where the compensation is based upon the achievement of specified financial results that are the subject of a subsequent restatement (see “Clawbacks; Risk Assessment” below).

Performance-BasedPerformance-based Long-Term Incentive Compensation -In 2016, the equity awards granted to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers will bewere comprised of a mix of time-vestingnon-qualified stock options and performance stock units that vest after three years based on the achievement ofpre-determined performance targets. We expect that this will continue to be the structure of our long-term incentive compensation program on a go forward basis.

No Hedging or Pledging -We prohibit our executives and directors from pledging, hedging, or engaging in any derivatives trading with respect to shares of our common stock.

No Automatic Single-TriggerChange-in-Control Vesting - All equity awards granted since our initial public offering in July 2011 have double-triggerchange-in-control vesting provisions.

No “Gross-ups”“Gross-ups” -We do not provide tax “gross-ups”“gross-ups” for compensation, perquisites or other benefits provided to our executive officers, other than in the case of certain relocation expenses, consistent with our relocation policy for all U.S.-based employees.employees, and the special taxgross-up for living expenses for Mr. Hoffmann that he negotiated for in connection with his hiring.

Stock Ownership Requirements -We require our executive officers to meet stock ownership requirements, and we require them to retain 50% of theafter-tax proceeds from stock option gains and the settlement of restricted stock units until they meet their required ownership levels (see “Stock Ownership Guidelines” below). In addition, shares of common stock delivered under performance stock units granted in 2016 generally may not be sold or transferred for one year following the dates the units vest, other than to satisfy tax withholding obligations. We also have stock ownership requirements for our directors, as discussed elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.under “Compensation of Directors”.

No Repricing -Our equity incentive plan prohibits the repricing or exchange of stock options and stock appreciation rights without shareholder approval.

Independent Compensation Consultant -The Compensation Committee has engaged an independent compensation consultant, Pearl Meyer, that has no other ties to the Company or its management and that meets the independence standards of NASDAQ (see “Competitive market data and the use of compensation consultants” below).

No “Golden Parachutes” - Any potential payments to executives upon separation from servicea termination of employment are relatively modest.

Perquisites -We provide our executives with a very limited range of executive perquisites and the aggregate value of all ongoing regular perquisites represents less thanone-half of one percent of aggregate total compensation for our named executive officers.

Highlights of 20152016 business performance

We believe that our named executive officers were instrumental in helping us drive results in 20152016 and in assessing our competitive position and shaping a long-term strategic plan that will best position ourselvesthe Company for continued growth in 20162017 and beyond. For fiscal 2015, we met or exceeded each of our financial performance targets and hadFiscal 2016 was a numberyear of significant operational achievements and strong financial performance, while we also returning more than $725returned approximately $165 million to shareholders in the form of share repurchases and an increased quarterly dividend. Financial and operational highlights of our fiscal 20152016 performance include the following:following1:

 

Increased revenue: Increased revenue to $810.9$828.9 million, an 8.3%a 2.2% increase from 2014;fiscal 2015 or $820.1 million on a52-week basis, a 1.1% increase.

 

Expanded global presence: Opened 440508 net new Dunkin’ Donuts and 55215 net new Baskin-Robbins locations globally, bringing Dunkin’ Brands to 19,35720,080 total points of distribution as ofyear-end 2015; 2016.

 

Successful Launch of K-Cup pods intoContinued success with the channel business: Launched Dunkin’ Donuts K-Cup pods into thousands of retail branded products, including Dunkin’ DonutsK-Cups, bagged coffee and online outlets nationwide; from the program’s launch in May 2015 through the endcreamers, each grew faster than their respective categories, indicating an increased share of the year, more than 150 million pods were sold into the grocery channel.market for each product.

 

Leveraged technology to drive results: Grew the DD Perks Loyalty Program to 4.3over 6 million members and app downloads to more than 16 million; successful testing of mobile ordering and delivery for Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.;held our first-ever “Perks Week” promotion in November, during which

1The fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 included 53 weeks, as compared to 52 weeks for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015. The impact of the extra week in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 reflects our estimate of the additional week in fiscal 2016 on certain revenues and expenses.

transactions by members of the program accounted for more than 11% of Dunkin’ Donuts total U.S. transactions. In June, we also launched theOn-the-Go ordering platform nationwide. In addition, we successfully launched the Baskin-Robbins mobile app in August.

 

Grew worldwide sales: Grew global system-widesystemwide sales by 4.1%6.6% over fiscal 2014;2015 or 5.2% on a52-week basis.

 

Drove positive comparable store sales in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S.: Increased Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales by 1.4%1.6% and Baskin-Robbins U.S. comparable store sales by 6.1%;0.7%.

 

Increased adjusted earnings per share: Increased diluted adjusted earnings per share by 10.9% to $1.93 versus $1.74 for 2014;

Successful Debt Refinancing: Completed a successful refinancing of our long-term debt at an attractive fixed rate.
Increased earnings per share and adjusted earnings per share2: Increased diluted earnings per share by 95.4% to $2.11, or 92.6% to $2.08 on a52-week basis, over fiscal 2015; Increased diluted adjusted earnings per share by 17.1% to $2.26, or 15.5% to $2.23 on a52-week basis, over fiscal 2015.

While driving successful 20152016 results, our named executive officers also kept a focus on the long term. While we ended the year within our guidance range, we were not satisfied with the Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales performance particularlyand do not believe that we have yet unleashed the full potential of Dunkin’ Donuts in the second half of 2015.U.S. To addressimprove our disappointing comparable store sales performance and with the goal of getting back to positive transaction growth, management designed, based on considerable consumer research, and began executing against a new 5-part6-part strategic growth plan, with the support of theour franchisees. The plan is focused on (i) further building our coffee culture by more aggressively pursuing coffee innovation, (ii) improving our innovation process in enhancing core product quality and accelerating our ability to take new products to market, (iii) implementing

targeted value and smart pricing, (iv) leading in the use of digital technology, including growing ourbest-in-class loyalty program, mobile ordering and delivery, and (v) continuing to improve our restaurant experience.experience, and (vi) driving Dunkin’ branded consumer packaged goods into new channels. This plan is designed for the long-term, to drive comparable store sales and traffic for Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and to protect and grow the long-term health and relevancy of the brand.

Fiscal 20152016 compensation

Compensation of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Consistent with our executive compensation principles described above, after considering his performance and assessing market competitiveness, the Compensation Committee, with advice from its independent consultant, set Mr. Travis’s salary and short- and long-term incentive compensation for fiscal 20152016 as follows:

 

Mr. Travis’ annual base salary remained at $1.0 million;

 

Mr. Travis’ target bonus opportunity under the Annual Planour annual management incentive plan (the “Annual Plan”) remained at 110% of base salary; his actual 20152016 award under the Annual Plan (paid in March 2016)2017) was $1.058 million (96.2%$983,425 (89.4% of target award);

 

2Adjusted earnings per share is anon-GAAP measure calculated using adjusted net income, reflecting net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairments, impairment of joint ventures, and certain other items, net of the tax impact of such adjustments. Please refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2017.

His 20152016 annual long-term incentives took the form of time-vested stock options withincentive awards had a grant date fair value of $3.342 million.$3.339 million, 70% of which took the form of time-based stock options and 30% of which took the form of performance stock units (“PSUs”), which vest based on the achievement of quantifiable performance criteria and continued service.

 

In 2015,2016, over 81% of Mr. Travis’s total compensation actually paid was tied to Company performance, with 62%approximately 63% of the total attributable to long-term incentives as shown:

 

LOGO

The factors considered when determining our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation are discussed below.LOGO

Compensation of our other Named Executive Officers

Hiring of Mr. Hoffmann

Effective October 3, 2016, the Company hired David Hoffmann as President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada. Mr. Hoffmann was hired to replace Paul Twohig who is retiring in March 2017. In determining Mr. Hoffmann’s compensation, Mr. Travis and the Compensation Committee took into consideration the value and structure of Mr. Hoffmann’s compensation arrangements with his then-current employer and, in particular, the intrinsic value of the equity awards he would be forfeiting if he resigned his employment to join Dunkin’ Brands. In addition to replacing Mr. Twohig, in hiring Mr. Hoffmann, Mr. Travis and the Compensation Committee also considered that they were hiring a potential successor to Mr. Travis, whose contract currently runs through December 31, 2018.

28

2016 Total Direct Compensation (TDC) - Nigel Travis, CEO


Mr. Travis recommended and the Compensation Committee approved, with advice from its independent compensation consultant, Mr. Hoffmann’s salary and short- and long-term incentive compensation under his employment offer letter as follows:

Annual base salary of $700,000;

Target bonus opportunity under the Annual Plan of 100% of base salary;

An annual long-term incentive award with a grant date fair value of $2.0 million to be delivered in accordance with the long-term incentive compensation program in effect at the time of the award.

In addition, in connection with his hiring, the Compensation Committee also approved a signing bonus of $1,100,000 (as further described below), a time-based restricted stock unit (“RSU”) award with a grant date fair value of approximately $1,400,000, and a PSU award with a grant date fair value of approximately $1,400,000 for Mr. Hoffmann. The signing bonus was intended to compensate Mr. Hoffmann for the annual bonus he expected to earn from his former employer for 2016 which was forfeited in order to join Dunkin’ Brands. To encourage Mr. Hoffmann to progress towards meeting the Company’s stock ownership guidelines for executives and to align his interests with those of our shareholders, the Compensation Committee incentivized Mr. Hoffmann to convert a portion of his signing bonus into RSUs, which are subject to vesting on the schedule described below, by providing him with an additional 25% of RSU value for each dollar of signing bonus that he chose to convert. Mr. Hoffmann elected to convert $450,000 of the cash value of the signing bonus into $562,500 of RSU value at the time of his hiring, with the remaining $650,000 in value to be paid in cash in March 2017 at the time the Annual Plan payments were being made. In structuring the equity awards, the Compensation Committee considered the intrinsic value and the form of equity awards Mr. Hoffmann was forfeiting and provided him with a value through new equity awards that it believed was fair to the Company and yet attractive enough for Mr. Hoffmann to consider leaving his prior employer.

Both RSU awards granted to Mr. Hoffmann will vest in equal installments on the first three anniversaries of his hire date, subject to his continued employment by Dunkin’ Brands through the applicable vesting date. The PSU award will vest three years from his hire date subject to the level of achievement of a three-year target for global adjusted operating income growth and will generally be subject to his continued employment through the end of the performance period.

The Compensation Committee also approved certain payments and benefits to Mr. Hoffmann due to the fact that he was living overseas and had to relocate him and his family to the U.S. in connection with becoming employed by the Company. In addition to reimbursing costs associated with relocating him and his family to the United States and up to three family visits, and providing for tax preparation and support for tax years impacted by his overseas assignment with his prior employer, the Compensation Committee also approved certain living expense-related payments to help ease the financial burden associated with Mr. Hoffmann’s family remaining overseas while he is no longer working there, together with agross-up for related taxes.

Other Named Executive Officers

The compensation for our other three named executive officers was determined by the Compensation Committee based upon the recommendations of Mr. Travis and the other factors described below.

Mr. Travis’ recommendations were based on his evaluation of each individual’s performance during the year. When making its determinations, the Compensation Committee also considered compensation data from the peer group provided by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant, internal pay relationships based on relative duties and responsibilities, the individual’s future advancement potential, and his impact on Dunkin’ Brands’ results. The Compensation Committee also considered the need to retain certain executives in light of the competitive hiring market.

In 2015, 76%2016, approximately 71% of the average total compensation paid to our other named executive officers (other than Mr. Hoffmann) was tied to Company performance, with 58%53% of the total attributable to long-term equity incentives as shown below.

 

LOGOLOGO

Note: the graphic above excludes the compensation of Mr. Hoffmann, who was hired effective October 3, 2016 and was provided with a signing bonus and equity awards upon hire that were intended to compensate him for the bonus and equity value he forfeit upon leaving his former employer. We consider these compensation arrangements to be specific to Mr. Hoffmann’s hiring. All of his compensation earned as an employee of Dunkin’ Brands in fiscal year 2016 is included in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

30

2016 Total Direct Compensation (TDC) - NEO Average


Elements of named executive officer compensation

The following is a discussion of the primary elements of the compensation for each of our named executive officers, which consisted of the following:

Element

Description

Primary Objectives

Base Salary

•  Fixed cash payment

•  Attract and retain talented individuals

•  Recognize career experience and individual performance

•  Provide competitive compensation

Short-Term Incentives

•  Performance-based annual cash incentives

•  Promote and reward achievement of the Company’s annual financial and strategic objectives and individualized personal goals

Long-Term Incentives

•  Time-based stock options

•  Align executive interests with shareholder interests by tying value to long-term stock performance

•  Attract and retain talented individuals

•  Performance-based restricted shares

•  Tie value earned to achievement of the Company’s long-term goals

•  Time-based restricted shares

•  Used on a selective basis to retain and motivate senior executives

Retirement and Welfare Benefits

•  Medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability insurance (STD & LTD)

•  Provide competitive benefits

•  401(k) plan

•  Provide tax-efficient retirement savings

•  Deferred Compensation Plan

•  Provide tax-efficient opportunity to supplement retirement savings

Executive Perquisites

•  Executive physical for Vice Presidents and above

•  Supplemental LTD Insurance

•  Promote health and well-being of senior executives

•  Provide competitive benefits

Severance Benefits

•  Cash and non-cash payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment

•  Retain and attract key employees

•  Provide a level of protection in the event of an involuntary termination of employment

Base salary

We pay our named executive officers a base salary to provide them with a fixed, base level of compensation. The base salaries of our named executive officers are reviewed periodically by our Chief Executive Officer (except with respect to his own base salary) and are approved by the Compensation Committee. They are intended to be competitive in light of the level and scope of the executive’s position and responsibilities. Decisions regarding base salary increases may take into account the named executive officer’s current salary,cash compensation, equity holdings, including stock options,awards, and the amounts paid to individuals in comparable positions as determined through an analysis of our peer group and/or published data from independent third-party compensation survey providers. No formulaic base salary increases are provided to our named executive officers, in line with our strategy of offering total compensation that is cost-effective, competitive and primarily based on the achievement of performance objectives.

In 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee determined to maintain base salary levels for Messrs. Travis Twohig and Costello.Twohig. The increaseincreases in Mr. Carbone’sMessrs. Carbone and Mitchell’s base salary waswere based on peer group analysis performed by the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant that showed that Mr. Carbone’sthe base salary for each was below the median for members of our peer group.

The table below shows the salaries for our named executive officers as determined by the Compensation Committee:

 

Name

 2014 Annual Base
Salary
 2015 Annual Base
Salary
 %
Increase
 

Notes

 2015 Annual Base
Salary
 2016 Annual Base
Salary
 %
Increase
 

Notes

Nigel Travis

 $1,000,000   $1,000,000   0.0  $1,000,000  $1,000,000  0.0 

Paul Carbone

 $415,000   $465,000    12.0 2015 base salary remains below the 25thpercentile of peer group. $465,000  $500,000   7.5 Prior to 2016 base salary increase, salary approximated the 25thpercentile of CFOs in peer group companies.

David Hoffmann

 $N/A  $700,000   N/A  Mr. Hoffmann commenced employment with us on October 3, 2016 and his base salary for 2016 waspro-rated accordingly.

Paul Twohig

 $600,000   $600,000   0.0  $600,000  $600,000   0.0 

John Costello

 $600,000   $600,000   0.0 

William Mitchell

 $460,000   $475,000   3.3  $475,000  $500,000   5.3 Prior to 2016 base salary increase, salary approximated the 40th percentile for equivalent positions in peer group companies.

Short-term incentive plan

In addition to receiving base salaries, executives participate in our annual management incentive plan (the “Annual Plan”).the Annual Plan. We believe that annual incentives should be based upon actual performance against specific, measurable business objectives. Each year, the Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the performance metrics that will be used under the Annual Plan to help ensure that the program design appropriately motivates our executive officers to achieve important financial and operational goals. For fiscal 2015,2016, in order to enhance our ability to deduct amounts paid under the Annual Plan as “performance based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Compensation Committee again choseestablished a maximum pool for annual awards (the “Maximum Pool”) under the Annual Plan. The Maximum Pool

was determined based on the attainment of a global adjusted operating income goal. The maximum payout opportunity for Mr. Travis was set at 0.7% of global adjusted operating income, and the maximum payout opportunity was set at 0.35% of global adjusted operating income for Messrs. Carbone, Twohig and Mitchell, but, in each case, not more than the maximum award amount permitted under the Annual Plan. Notwithstanding the determination of the maximum payout opportunity with respect to each named executive officer (other than Mr. Hoffmann) based on the Maximum Pool, the Compensation Committee determined the amounts actually earned by such named executive officers consistent with the Annual Plan design for employees generally and as further described below.

For fiscal 2016, the Compensation Committee continued to use global adjusted operating income as the performance metric that would be used to establishdetermine the actual funding levels under the Annual Plan. The use of global adjusted operating income as the performance metric under the Annual Plan provides a link between the compensation payable to our executives and the value we create for our shareholders. Global adjusted operating income is also a key metric used by us and by our shareholders to evaluate our business performance. Global adjusted operating income is anon-GAAP financial measure. An explanation of how we calculate this measure is contained in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2015,31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Compensation Committee set the global adjusted operating income target for fiscal 20152016 at a level it believed was both challenging and achievable. By establishing a target that is challenging, the Compensation Committee believes that the performance of our employees, and therefore our

performance, is maximized. By setting a target that is also achievable, the Compensation Committee believes that employees will remain motivated to perform at the high level required to achieve the target.

The level of potential funding under the Annual Plan for fiscal 20152016 ranged from 0% to 225% of target based on our actual performance relative to the global adjusted operating income target, with a threshold funding level established by the Compensation Committee based on the minimum level of global adjusted operating income performance that would result inrequired for any level of funding under the Annual Plan.

Once our global adjusted operating income performance is determined after the close of the fiscal year, the actual funding level for bonuses that may be paid under the Annual Plan is established. The bonus pool available under the Annual Plan based on its funding levelThis amount is then allocated to participants in the plan based on the achievement of relevant financial or operational business goals such as revenue, comparable store sales and net development (i.e., the number of new store openings minus the number of store closings). These specific goals are chosen due to their impact on our profitability. These goals are arranged into three categories: Primary, Secondary and Personal. Primary business goals are key financial or operational goals that are influenced or impacted by the activities of the broader organization. The Primarymost directly influence our financial results. Secondary business goals are shared among all executives in order to encourage cross-functional collaboration. Secondary business goals are key financial goals that relate most directly to the executive based on his role within the Company and his ability to impact certain aspects of our business. Personal goals are measurable operational or business goals that relate directly to the duties and responsibilities of the individual executive. Performance against each goal category is measured separately. In 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a change in the Annual Plan goal structure, both weighting and targets, to more appropriately reward the achievement of key business goals that drive the overall results of the Company, namely Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales and net development. The goals are now weighted as follows: Primary (35%)(50% from 35% in 2015), Secondary (30%(25% from 30%) and Personal (35%(25% from 35%). This weighting allows each set of goals to be taken into account in a manner that is generally equal, withmeaningful way, while placing more weight placed on the achievement of relevant companythe Company performance metrics.metrics that most directly drive overall

results. During the year, regular communication takes place within the Company to ensure that all executives are aware of progress against their goals.

The table below listsIn 2016, the 2015 Primary and Secondary business goals under the Annual Plan for each named executive officer:Messrs. Travis, Carbone and Twohig were as follows.

 

Name and Title

Goal typeType

 

  

Metric

 

PrimaryDunkin’ Donuts U.S. Comparable Store Sales (70%)

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development (30%)

Nigel TravisPrimarySecondary  Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. Global Total Revenue

In 2016, Mr. Mitchell’s Primary business goals under the Annual Plan were related to his International business unit responsibilities. He shared the same Secondary business goal with the other named executive officers. His goals were as follows:

Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerSecondary

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Comparable Sales (80%)

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development (20%)

Paul CarbonePrimaryDunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Total Revenue
Chief Financial OfficerSecondary

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Comparable Sales (80%)

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development (20%)

Paul TwohigPrimaryDunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Total Revenue
President, Dunkin’ Donuts US and CanadaSecondary

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. U.S. Comparable Sales (60%)

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development (40%)

John CostelloPrimaryDunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Total Revenue
President, Global Marketing and InnovationSecondary

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Comparable Sales (80%)

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development (20%)

Name and Title

Goal typeType

 

  

Metric

 

PrimaryDunkin’ Brands International Adjusted Operating Income (70%)

Dunkin’ Brands International Net Development (30%)

William MitchellPrimarySecondary  Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. Global Total Revenue

Mr. Hoffmann was not eligible to participate in the Annual Plan in 2016 due to the timing of his employment with Dunkin’ Brands and the fact that his signing bonus was intended to replace the 2016 annual bonus he forfeited by leaving his prior employer.

Our named executive officers’ Personal goals for 2016 were as follows:

President, International(1)Secondary

Key Personal Goals Under the Annual Plan

  

Named Executive
Officer(s) with
Primary
Accountability

•   Delivering financial and operational goals for the relevant business unit(s).

All

•   Increasing brand relevance through strong marketing and product plans.

Travis

•   Executingin-store sales-driving activities includingOn-the-Go ordering across the Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. system, Dunkin’ Donuts delivery/curbside/tablets test, and the Baskin-Robbins U.S. Comparable Sales (80%)mobile application.

Travis & Carbone

•   Expanding our global consumer engagement efforts in mobile, loyalty, media and public relations.

Travis & Twohig

Baskin-Robbins U.S. Net Development (20%)•   Implementing improvements to store operations and implementing newpoint-of-sale and back office systems in both brands.

Twohig & Carbone

•   Capitalizing on new revenue streams and launchingready-to-drink beverage products.

Travis & Carbone

•   Enhancing our overall guest experience; improving guest satisfaction scores by 1%.

Twohig

•   Achieving growth and expansion plans: accelerating redevelopment in Dunkin’ Donuts store development agreements, opening of budgeted new markets; executing key strategic changes in Europe/UK and with the Japan joint venture.

Twohig & Mitchell

•   Developing the next generation of leaders at Dunkin’ Brands and continuing to make Dunkin’ Brands a great place to work for all employees

All

(1)Mr. Mitchell became President, International on 11/1/2015, and his goals were set before he assumed this position.

Personal goals for fiscal 2015 were the relevant strategic and operational goals for the respective named executive officer and include:

Achieve a successful approach to Dunkin’ Donuts packaged goods / brand extension in the U.S.;

Achieve franchisee cost savings in the U.S.;

Execute a new capital structure for Dunkin’ Brands;

Execute strong marketing and product innovation, with a focus on delivering beverage category growth;

Execute new sales-driving activities in-store, including catering and mobile ordering in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.; and

Expand our global consumer engagement efforts in mobile, loyalty and social media.

The achievement of Personal goals under the Annual Plan is reviewed after the close of the relevant fiscal year and is taken into account by the Compensation Committee in determining annual bonuses on a discretionary basis. Personal goals are initially deemed achieved at a level determined by multiplying the adjusted global operating income-based funding level (expressed as a percentage) multiplied by 25%, with the actual amount earned in respect of the Personal goal portion of the annual bonus determined by the Compensation Committee after reviewing each named executive officer’s level of achievement against his goals during the fiscal year.

At the conclusion of the fiscal year, global adjusted operating income results are determined by our finance department based on our audited financial results. These results are presented to the Compensation Committee for consideration and approval. TheAfter the Maximum Pool is determined, the Compensation Committee retains the discretion to adjust (upwards or downwards) the global adjusted operating income results for purposes of determining the actual funding levels under the Annual Plan to take into account the occurrence of extraordinary events affecting global adjusted operating income performance. In addition, in setting the global adjusted operating income thresholdsthreshold, target and maximum goals and determining our achievement of such thresholds,goals, the Compensation Committee may exclude certain revenues and expenses related to our business as it deems appropriate. There were no such adjustments or exclusions made byIn 2016, for all purposes other than determining the Maximum Pool, the Compensation Committee decided to exclude

certain expenses related to the engagement of a management consulting firm hired to assist the Company in developing the Company’s long-term strategic plan, as well as expenses related to the search and recruitment of Mr. Hoffmann, in determining our global adjusted operating income performance for Annual Plan funding purposes. In both cases, these expenses, which amounted to approximately $5.7 million in 2015.total, were considerable and were not foreseen when the global adjusted operating income target was established for the year.

After the Compensation Committee determines the bonus pool under the Annual Plan based on its determination of the level of ourachievement of global adjusted operating income, achieved,as adjusted as described above and below, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer then recommendsmakes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding amounts payable to each named executive officer (other than himself) under the Annual Plan based on performance against his respective Primary, Secondary and Personal goals. The Compensation Committee makes all determinations with respect to Mr. Travis’s bonus.bonus and determines the actual amounts that are paid to the other named executive officers.

Short-term incentive awards

After considering the executive compensation competitive analysis performed in 2015 by Pearl Meyer as described below under “Competitive market data and use of compensation consultants”, the Compensation Committee determined that certain increasesan increase in the target bonus opportunitiesopportunity for Messrs. Carbone andMr. Mitchell in 20152016 should be implemented under the Annual Plan to remain

competitive with our peers. The target bonus opportunities of our other named executive officers remained unchanged.unchanged in 2016. The threshold, target and maximum opportunities (as a percentage of base salary and as described more fully below) established under the Annual Plan and payable to each named executive officer if achievement relative to the 20152016 global adjusted operating income target resulted in a fully funded plan and, if applicable, the named executive officer achieved each of his Primary, Secondary and Personal goals were:

 

  Annual Plan Opportunity as a % of Base Salary   Annual Plan Opportunity as a % of Base Salary 
Named Executive Officer(1)  Threshold % Target % Maximum %   Threshold% Target% Maximum% 

Nigel Travis

           27.5     110           248           27.5     110           248

Paul Carbone (1)

           18.8 75 169           18.8 75 169

Paul Twohig

   18.8 75 169   18.8 75 169

John Costello

   18.8 75 169

William Mitchell (2)

   17.5 70 158   18.8 75 169

 

(1)The incentive targetAs noted above, Mr. Hoffmann did not receive a bonus under the Annual Plan for Mr. Carbone was increased from 60% to 75% effective at the start of fiscal 2015.2016.
(2)The incentive target for Mr. Mitchell was increased from 60%70% to 70% effective75% at the start of fiscal 20152016.

Full funding (100% of target funding) for the 20152016 Annual Plan was contingent on achievement of our global adjusted operating income target of $389.6$437.3 million. The funding threshold level (25% of target funding) was contingent on achievement of 90% of the global adjusted operating income target, meaning that if global adjusted operating income performance achievement fell below $350.6$393.6 million, no funding would be achieved under the Annual Plan and no payments would be made. The maximum funding level for the Annual Plan (225% of target funding) was contingent on the achievement of 110% of the global adjusted operating income target, or achievement of $428.6$481.0 million of global adjusted operating income.

Below is a comparison of 2015 and 2016 global adjusted operating income performance achievement levels:

 

LOGOLOGO

Our 20152016 global adjusted operating income performance under the Annual Plan was $400.5$436.6 million, or 102.9%99.8% of our adjusted operating income target. After the exclusion by the Compensation Committee of the extraordinary expenses described above, our global adjusted operating income performance for Annual Plan funding purposes was $442.3 million (“Annual Plan Global Adjusted Operating Income”). This translated to a funding level of 127.5%110% of target in accordance with the funding schedule set forth in the Annual Plan and as illustrated below.

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Once the adjusted operating income performance was certified and the funding level for the Annual Plan pool was established at $21.0M, management recommended and the Compensation Committee approved a $3.0M reduction in the Annual Plan pool to better reflect the under-performance of the Company’s stock price in late 2015. 37

Global Adjusted Operating Income Performance vs. Target- 2015 vs. 2016


With the pool finally determined, our Chief Executive Officer recommended to the Compensation Committee amounts to be paid to each named executive officer (other than himself) under the Annual Plan based on performance against each individual’s Primary, Secondary and Personal goals. The determination of the amount that each individual (other than Mr. Hoffmann, as noted above) received that was based upon achievement of the Primary and Secondary business goals was formulaic, as shown in the table below. The determination of the amount that each individual received that was based on the achievement of Personal goals was based on the Compensation Committee’s assessment (after consideration of the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation) of the individual’s performance against his individualPersonal goals. When assessing the amount of the bonus that each executive was entitled to earn, the Compensation Committee applied the same principles to our Chief Executive Officer as it did to the other named executive officers.officers (other than Mr. Hoffmann).

 

Primary and Secondary Business Goals(1)

  Target
Performance
   Actual
Performance
   %
Earned
 

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Total Revenue ($MM)

  $        810.9    $812.2     100.0%  

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Comparable Sales

   2.41%     1.22%     47.5%  

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development, comprised of:

       86.25%  

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net New Stores (50% weight)

   430     349     70.0%  

Dunkin’ Donuts New First Year Sales ($MM) (50% weight)

  $173.30    $    174.45     102.5%  

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Comparable Sales — U.S.

   2.55%     1.73%     66.25%  

Baskin-Robbins Comparable Sales — U.S.

   3.22%     6.12%     190.0%  

Baskin-Robbins U.S. Net Development, comprised of:

       136.3%  

Baskin-Robbins U.S. Net New Stores (50% weight)

   13     22     110.0%  

Baskin-Robbins New First Year Sales ($MM) (50% weight)

  $6.23    $7.03     162.5%  

Primary and Secondary Business Goals(1)

  Target
Performance
  Actual
Performance
  %
Earned
 

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Comparable Sales

   2.00  1.56  77.5% 

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net Development, comprised of:

     41.25% 

Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Net New Stores (50% weight)

   450   397   80.0% 

Dunkin’ Donuts New First Year Sales ($MM) (50% weight)

  $201.89  $172.90   2.5% 

Dunkin’ Brands Inc. Global Total Revenue ($MM)

  $860.32  $828.89   52.5% 

Dunkin’ Brands International Adjusted Operating Income ($MM)

  $60.39  $48.92   81.0% 

Dunkin’ Brands International Net Development

   257   317   155.0% 

 

(1)Each metric is as defined under the Annual Plan or award agreements evidencing grants thereunder.

38

Annual Plan Funding Annual Plan Global Adjusted Operating Income ($M)


For 2015,2016, based upon a review of the Personal goals of each named executive officer, our Chief Executive Officer recommended to the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee determined that Messrs.Mr. Carbone receive a discretionary increase to the amount of his award under the Annual Plan to reflect his superior performance and contribution to the success of the Company and Mr. Carbone’s leadership responsibilities with respect to (i) the successful launch and continued growth of the Company’s retail branded products, (ii) the development of the Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.6-part strategic growth plan, and (iii) the excellent work performed by our information technology team (led by Mr. Carbone) to develop mobile technology to promote greater engagement with our consumers and drive results. Mr. Travis also recommended that Mr. Twohig Costello and Mitchell receive a reduction in the amount of the fundedbonus that would otherwise have been paid to him assuming that his Personal goal componentgoals had been satisfied in full and the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Twohig earned 95% of their respective 2015 bonus underhis Personal goals. The Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Travis should also receive a discretionary increase to his award on the Annual Plan.basis of his outstanding performance relative to his Personal goals and in recognition of the value that was delivered for shareholders in 2016. The table below lists the payouts to each named executive officer as a percentage of eligible base salary earnings and as a percentage of his target award.

 

  Weighted Contribution Toward Annual Plan Payout   Weighted Contribution Toward Annual Plan Payout 

Named Executive Officer

  Primary and
Secondary
Business Goals
(65% of Total
Opportunity)(1)
   Personal Goals
and
Annual Plan
Funding
(35% of Total
Opportunity)(2)
   Adjustment
to Personal
Goals(3)
   Actual Award %
(%of Target Award)
   Primary and
Secondary
Business Goals
(75% of Total
Opportunity)(1)
   Personal Goals
and
Annual Plan
Funding
(25% of Total
Opportunity)(2)
   Adjustment
to Personal
Goals(3)
   Actual Award %
(% of Target Award)
 

Nigel Travis

   51.6%                     44.6%     0%                             96.2%     46.4%                    27.5%    15.5%                        89.4% 

Paul Carbone

   51.6%     44.6%     0%     96.2%     46.4%    27.5%    25.8%    99.7% 

Paul Twohig

   57.3%     44.6%     (5.7)%     96.2%     46.4%    27.5%    (1.4)%    72.6% 

John Costello

   51.6%     44.6%     (8.2)%     88.0%  

William Mitchell

   88.8%     44.6%     (7.6)%     125.8%     53.0%    27.5%    0.0%    80.5% 

 

(1)Represents the earned portion of the award with respect to each of our named executive officer’s Primary and Secondary business goals based on performance results described in the preceding table and the applicable weightings described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of named executive officer compensation—Short-term incentive plan”.

(2)Represents the adjusted global operating income-based funding level (127.5%(110%) multiplied by the remaining portion of the award (35%(25%).
(3)Represents the discretionary adjustments approved by the Compensation Committee for Messrs. Travis, Carbone and Twohig. Adjustments for Messrs. Carbone and Twohig Costello and Mitchell.were recommended by Mr. Travis.

Long-term equity incentive program

The primary goals of our long-term equity incentive program are to align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our shareholders, to drive long-term Company performance through the use of performance-based incentives with a multi-year time horizon and to encourage executive retention through the use of service-based vesting requirements. As discussed below, the Compensation Committee awarded

In 2016, each of our named executive officers, other than Mr. Hoffmann, received a grant of equity awards that included both time-based stock options to all named executive officersand PSUs. 70% of the value delivered with this equity grant came in 2015 consistent with the termsform of our annual long-term equity incentive award program adoptedtime-based stock options, while 30% of the value was in fiscal 2012.

the form of PSUs. We consider stock options to be performance-based because no value is created unless the value of our common stock appreciates after grant and the same value is created for our shareholders. Because value is tied to long-term stock performance, we believe that stock options are an excellent

vehicle to align executive interests with shareholder interests.

In We implemented PSU grants in 2016 based in part on a 2015 eachanalysis by Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, of our named executive officers received a grantpeer group’s practices and to further strengthen our long-termpay-for-performance linkage and diversify our equity award portfolio for executives. We chose three-year adjusted operating income growth and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) as the underlying performance goals for these awards because they reflect the fundamental strength of stock options. our business, in the case of adjusted operating income, and because they reflect the strength of our performance relative to other companies in which our investors may potentially invest.

In determining the size of the stock optionequity grants awarded to each named executive officer, the Compensation Committee took into account a number of factors such as the target total direct compensation levels and long-term incentive values awarded to executives in our peer group companies, as well as internal factors such as the individual’s responsibilities, position and the size and value of the long-term incentive awards historically granted to our executives. Stock options granted in fiscal 20152016 vest in four equal annual installments, generally subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date.

The Compensation Committee retains discretion to grant stock options or other equity-based awards to employees at any time, includingPSUs granted in connection with a promotion, to reward an employee, for retention purposes or in other circumstances. In 2015, as described further below, the Compensation Committee exercised this discretion and granted a supplemental equity award to Mr. Carbone in order to further incentivize him to remain with the Company as well as to drive shareholder value.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee asked Pearl Meyer to conduct a review of the long-term incentive practices of our compensation peer group, described below. Based on that review and feedback received from our investors, the Compensation Committee decided to modify our long-term equity incentive program to include grants of performance stock units (“PSUs”) in addition to time-based stock option grants. Beginning in 2016 our named executive officers will receive an annual grant of equity that will include both time-based stock options and PSUs. In 2016, 70% of the value to be delivered under the long-term equity incentive will consist of time-based stock options, while 30% of such value will be in the form of PSUs. The Compensation Committee intends to continue this long-term incentive structure in the future.

The vesting schedule for the time-based stock options will remain unchanged. The PSUs will vest after three years based on the achievement of performance objectives approved by the Compensation Committee prior toat the beginning of the performance period, generally subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. In 2016, halfthird anniversary of the date of grant. For PSU equity valueawards granted in 2016, a portion of the PSUs will take the form of PSUs that willbe eligible to vest based on the achievement of a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income. The other halfincome and a portion of the valuePSUs will take the form of PSUs that willbe eligible to vest based on the achievement

of a total shareholder return targetCompany’s TSR relative to the TSR of the companies that comprisemake up the S&P 500 Index.index over a three-year performance period. The number of shares issuable under the relative TSR portion of the PSUs will be determined based on the level at which the goals are achieved and can range from 0% of the shares subject to the award (if the Company’s TSR percentile rank is less than the 30th percentile of the S&P 500), to 100% of the target award (if the TSR percentile rank is at the 52.5th percentile) to a maximum of 200% (if the TSR percentile rank is at or greater than the 75th percentile). After grant, PSUs are credited with dividend equivalents upon the payment of any dividends by us to our shareholders, and such dividend equivalents vest in accordance with the performance schedule of the associated PSU award. Any shares delivered under PSUs that are earned will generally be further subject to aone-year mandatory holding period after the PSUs are settled.

Supplemental restricted stock awardIn addition, as described above, in connection with his commencement of employment, Mr. Hoffmann received a grant of RSUs and PSUs. The PSUs will be eligible to vest based on the achievement of a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income from our fiscal 2016 results, generally subject to Mr. Carbone

On February 12, 2015, Mr. Carbone was granted a special retention awardHoffmann’s continued employment on the third anniversary of 21,101 sharesthe date of restricted stock thatgrant. The RSUs will vest in two approximatelythree equal portions on February 12, 2018 and February 12, 2019,installments, generally subject to his remaining continuously employed by the Company throughcontinued employment on the applicable vesting date. The Compensation Committee determined that time-vested restricted stock wasAs described above, Mr. Hoffmann also received additional RSUs in exchange for converting a portion of the most suitable equity award typecash bonus he would otherwise have received with respect to achievefiscal year 2016 into equity-based awards. These RSUs vest on the objective of retaining Mr. Carbonesame schedule as the size of the award and its vesting conditions make it very likely to deliver substantial valueother RSUs granted to him as long as he remains employed by the Company. The delayed vesting schedule was part of a design meant to encourage Mr. Carbone to make a multi-year employment commitment to us.in 2016.

Early 2016 compensation actions

On February 23, 2016, the Compensation Committee took several actions related to 2016 compensation for our named executive officers. Specifically, the Compensation Committee approved no increase in target total cash compensation for Messrs. Travis, Twohig and Costello, and increases to the target total cash compensation for Messrs. Carbone and Mitchell as described below:

Name

  Salary as
of
12/26/2015
   New
Salary as of
3/6/2016
   % Increase  Annual
Plan
Target
(%)
  Target
Annual
Plan ($)
   Target Total
Cash
Compensation
   % Increase In
Target Total
Cash
Compensation
 

Nigel Travis

  $1,000,000    $1,000,000     0.0  110  $1,100,000     $2,100,000     0.0

Paul Carbone

   $465,000     $500,000     7.5  75  $375,000     $875,000     7.5

Paul Twohig

   $600,000     $600,000     0.0  75  $450,000     $1,050,000     0.0

John Costello

   $600,000     $600,000     0.0  75  $450,000     $1,050,000     0.0

William Mitchell

   $475,000     $500,000     5.3  75  $375,000     $875,000     8.4

The increases in target total cash compensation for Mr. Carbone and Mr. Mitchell reflect the additional responsibilities taken on by such individual during the prior year.

In addition, on that date the Compensation Committee made initial awards under the Company’s new performance stock unit award program to our named executive officers (and other senior executives). The performance stock unit awards represent 30% of the annual long-term incentive award values delivered in 2016 (see “Long-term equity incentive plan” above). The Committee also approved a change in the 2016 Annual Plan goal structure, both weighting and targets, to more appropriately reward the achievement of key business goals that drive the overall results of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., namely Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. comparable store sales and net development.

Compensation framework: policies and process

Roles of Compensation Committee and our Chief Executive Officer in compensation decisions

The Compensation Committee oversees our executive compensation program, is responsible for approving the natureform and amount of the compensation paid to our executive officers, approving any employment and related agreements entered into with our executive officers, approving equity awards

granted to our executive officers and administering our equity compensation plans and awards. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee with respect to salary adjustments, annual cash bonus targets and awards and equity incentive awards for our named executive officers (other than himself) and the other executive officers reporting to him. The Compensation Committee meets with our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at least annually to discuss and review his compensation recommendations for our executive officers. In making compensation decisions for all of our named executive officers, including our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee considers many factors, including the officer’s experience, responsibilities, management abilities and job performance, the Company’s performance as a whole, current market conditions and pay levels for similar positions at our peer companies listed below. Those factors are considered in a subjective manner without any specific formula or weighting. The Compensation Committee, as the ultimate body that approves the compensation of our executive officers, has the discretion, and has exercised this discretion, to increase or decrease the amounts of compensation recommended by our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Competitive market data and use of compensation consultants

The Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer in fiscal 20152016 on a variety of matters related to executive and equity-based compensation. Pearl Meyer prepared an analysis onof the competitiveness of our executive compensation in fiscal 2015,2016, and the Compensation Committee used it as a reference point in setting pay levels for executives for fiscal 2015.2016. In preparing the analysis, Pearl Meyer relied on our Compensation Committee-approved peer group to analyze the competitiveness of compensation opportunities provided to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other named executive officers, and on proprietary compensation survey data to ascertain the compensation market for other members of senior management who are not named executive officers. This analysis also included a review of the annual share usage in respect of long-term incentive compensation for this peer group. The peer group of companies used in Pearl Meyer’s analysis was originally developed by the Compensation Committee’s previous compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., and was reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee in 2014. These peers were chosen primarily based on the following selection criteria as defined by the Compensation Committee:

 

Comparable Industry/Business Model: Quick service and restaurant industry focus; franchise-oriented business modelmodel.
Peer Company Size: Sizing factors included revenue,market capitalization, operating income, enterprise value and revenue. While the Compensation Committee considered revenue in choosing the companies that comprise the peer group, it prioritized market capitalization and operating income because the Compensation Committee believes that these are the most appropriate measures of the Company’s size given its 100% franchised model.
Statistical Reliability: Peer group size of between 12 and 20 companiescompanies.
Executive Talent Sources: Companies with whom Dunkin’ Brands competes for talenttalent.

The approved peer group consists of the 14 publicly-traded companies listed below:

 

Brinker International

  Cracker Barrel  Keurig Green MountainJack in the Box  Wendy’s Co.

Bloomin’ Brands

  Darden Restaurants  Panera  Yum! Brands

Cheesecake Factory

  DineEquity  Restaurant Brands International  

Chipotle Mexican Grill

  Domino’s Pizza  Starbucks  

The Compensation Committee intends to review this peer group periodically to ensure that it remains the appropriate comparable group for the Company. The peer group in 20152016 remained the same as in 20142015 except that,

because Keurig Green Mountain is no longer a publicly-traded company following the merger between Burger King Worldwide and Tim Horton’s,its acquisition, the Compensation Committee, substitutedbased on the combined entity (Restaurant Brands International) forrecommendation of Pearl Meyer, replaced Keurig Green Mountain with quick service restaurant company Jack in the two previously-separate companies.Box.

Pearl Meyer also prepared an analysisrecommended a plan design for our Annual Plan that seeks to maximize our flexibility to make payments under the Annual Plan that are exempt from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) of the Company’s future equity compensation share pool requirements under the 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The Committee relied on this analysis in recommending the size of the proposed share pool under the 2015 Plan, which was approved by our shareholders at our 2015 annual meeting.Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, Pearl Meyer prepared and presented data on the long-term incentive practices of the compensation peer group and at the Compensation Committee’s request, prepared a recommendation on alternative equity incentives that the Compensation Committee might consider incorporating into the Company’s long-term equity incentive program. These alternative equity considerationsarrangements were considered by the Compensation Committee when implementingdetermining the equity award types and mix of our long-term equity compensation program for 2016 and adding PSUs to the types of equity awards that we grant to our executive officers.2017.

Pearl Meyer also utilized the peer group to prepare and present an analysis of the competitivenessparticipated in a review of the compensation program for our non-employee Directors, and made a recommendationoffered to increase certain aspects of the compensation of the non-employee DirectorsMr. Hoffmann in May 2015, as described above under“Compensation of Directors.”

connection with his hiring. Finally, Pearl Meyer also prepared and presented a compensation risk assessment for the Compensation Committee’s consideration.

Pearl Meyer provided no services to the Company or the Compensation Committee other than those described above. After consideration of the six independence assessment factors provided under the listing rules of NASDAQ, the Compensation Committee determined that Pearl Meyer, as advisor to the Compensation Committee during 2015,2016, was independent and that the work performed by Pearl Meyer did not raise any conflicts of interest in 20152016 that would preclude the Compensation Committee from reviewing and considering Pearl Meyer’s analyses when making compensation decisions.

Other Compensation Policies

Separation Benefits

The Compensation Committee believes that maintaining a competitive level of separation benefits is an appropriate element of a compensation program that is designed to attract and retain industry-leading talent. The Compensation Committee further believes that separation benefits should only be paid if there is an actual termination of employment. As a result, we do not have any single-trigger change in control entitlements. We also do not maintain any special change in control severance plans and do not provide any of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, withso-called “golden parachute” taxgross-ups. Each named executive officer is entitled to certain payments and benefits upon a qualifying termination, including salary continuation, pursuant to such individual’s employment agreement or offer letter. These arrangements are more fully described below under “Potential payments upon termination or change in control.”

Equity compensation

As more fully described below under “Potential payments upon termination or change in control,”control”, our named executive officers’ stock option and other equity award agreements also provide for accelerated

vesting upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control. The agreements (other than the new PSU award agreements and the agreement for Mr. Travis’s 2014 performance-based restricted stock award) provide that if the employment of the executive is terminated by the Company or its successor without cause or by the executive for good reason within the18-month period following a change in control, his equity awards will vest in full upon such termination. In the case of PSUs granted in 2016, if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period associated with such awards, the Compensation Committee will determine the extent to which the performance goals under such awards have been met as of such change in control and any earned PSUs will be converted into time-based restricted stock units that continue to vest based on the same schedule as the original PSUs. If an executive’s employment is terminated following a change in control as described above, the units will vest in full upon such termination. Mr. Travis’s performance-based restricted stock agreement provides that if there is a change in control prior to the vesting date, the award will vest in full if Mr. Travis remains employed by the Company through December 31, 2018. Since these protections are meaningful only if the equity awards held by the executives are assumed in the change in control transaction, each of the awards will vest in full at the time of the transaction if they are not assumed by the acquirer in such transaction.

Employee benefits and perquisites

We provide our executive officers with access to the same health and welfare benefits we provide to all of our full-time employees, such as medical, dental, vision and disability insurance benefits. All of our full-time employees in the United States, including our named executive officers, are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). Pursuant to the 401(k) Plan, employees, including our named executive officers, may elect to defer a portion of their salary and receive a Company match of up to 4% of salary for fiscal 2015,2016, subject to limits set forth in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). We also offer senior employees, including our named executive officers, the opportunity to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan allows participants to defer certain elements of their compensation with the potential to receive earnings on deferred amounts. We believe the 401(k) Plan and the Deferred Compensation Plan are important retention and recruitment tools because they help facilitate retirement savings and provide financial flexibility for our key employees, and because many of the companies with which we compete for executive talent provide similar plans to their key employees.

In 2015, the Board and shareholders approved anOur Employee Stock Purchase Plan (‘ESPP’(“ESPP”) for all eligible U.S. employees, including our named executive officers. The ESPP provides participating employees with the opportunity to purchase our stock, subject to limits set forth in the Code, at a 10% discount to its price at the end of each offering period. None ofOf our named executive officers, only Mr. Travis participated in the ESPP in 2015.2016.

We offer limited perquisites and personal benefits to our named executive officers. We provide our named executive officers with a limited number of sporting event tickets and limited use of a company automobile and pay for the cost of executive physicals and supplemental long-term disability insurance. In connection with the hiring of Mr. Hoffmann, we provided him with certain additional payments and benefits associated with his and his family’s relocation to the United States from overseas and his family remaining overseas for a limited period of time without his being employed there. The costs associated with all perquisites and benefits are included in the Summary Compensation Table.

Clawbacks; risk assessment

In February 2015, the Board of Directors approvedThe Company has implemented an Incentive Compensation Recoupment, or “clawback” policy. This policy, which applies to incentive awards granted under cash and equity plans to any of our executive officers (“Covered Participants”) after January 1, 2015, states that in the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial statements due to materialnon-compliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws, the Board shallwill review the performance-based compensation awarded or paid to Covered Participants during the three-year period preceding the date on which the Company is required to prepare the restatement. If the amount of such

compensation would have been lower had the level of achievement of applicable financial performance goals been calculated based on such restated financial results, the Board may, in all appropriate cases, seek reimbursement from any Covered Participant of the amount of the excess compensation awarded or paid to such Covered Participant, net of tax. In addition, if a Covered Participant knowingly engaged in misconduct that was a material factor in the Company’s obligation to restate its financial statements, the Company will have the right to seek recoupment of the proceeds from the sale of shares issued upon exercise of stock options or upon vesting of restricted stock and or units occurring during the12-month period preceding the announcement by the Company of its obligation to restate its financial statements, in an amount determined appropriate by the Board under the circumstances. Administration and enforcement of the Recoupment Policy is the responsibility of the Board. The Board has sole discretion to determine whether, and from whom, to seek recovery, as well as the form and timing of any recovery, which may include, among other forms of recovery, repayment and an adjustment to future incentive-based compensation payouts or grants. The remedies under this Recoupment Policy are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any legal and equitable claims the Company may have or any actions imposed by law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities.

In 2015,2016, the Compensation Committee, pursuant to an independent assessment performed by Pearl Meyer, determined that the risks arising from our compensation practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Emphasis on long-term ownership

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under the executive stock ownership policy guidelines established by the Compensation Committee, our named executive officers are expected to own shares of our stock with a value equal to at least the following multiples of their annual base salaries:

 

Named Executive Officer

  Stock
Ownership
Guideline (1)
 

Nigel Travis

   6x 

Paul Carbone

   3x 

Paul TwohigDavid Hoffmann

   3x 

John CostelloPaul Twohig

   3x 

William Mitchell

   3x 

 

(1)Represents the applicable multiple of the named executive officer’s annual base salary.

This policy is designed to increase the named executive officers’ ownership stakes in the Company and align their interests with the interests of our shareholders. “Ownership” for purposes of this policy is defined to include stock owned directly or indirectly by the executive officer or any of such person’s

immediate family members residing in the same household, shares held in trust for the benefit of the executive officer or such person’s family, shares held in our employee benefit plans, including the 401(k) Plan and the ESPP, and shares obtained through stock option exerciseexercises and the netin-the-money value of vested but unexercised stock options, shares of vested restricted stock and shares underlying vested restricted stock units.RSUs. While there is no set period in which these ownership levels must be met, until they are met, each executive officer will be required to retain a level of shares following the vesting or exercise of equity awards granted after May 15, 2012 (the date our stock ownership guidelines were established), as follows: Mr. Travis, 100% of the net profit shares and the other executive officers, 50% of the net profit shares. “Net profit shares” are those shares that remain after deducting the exercise

price, in the event of the exercise of options, and applicable withholding taxes in the event of all equity awards. As of December 31, 2015,2016, the date of the annual measurement of ownership for purposes of this policy, Messrs.Mr. Travis and Costello had met the stock ownership guidelines set forth under the policy.

Prohibition on Hedging and/or Pledging our Common Stock. We have adopted an insider trading policy that prohibits insiders from hedging their ownership of our common stock, engaging in any derivatives trading with respect to our common stock, or pledging shares of common stock.

Tax and accounting considerations

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code disallows a tax deduction for any publicly-held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1 million in any taxable year for a company’s named executive officers, other than its chief financial officer, unless compensation qualifies as performance-based under such section. The Compensation Committee generally considers the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under our programs as one of the factors to be considered when establishing our executive compensation programs. However, the Compensation Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains and rewards the executives necessary for our success. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee may (and has), in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions, in whole or in part, under Section 162(m) or that may otherwise be limited as to tax deductibility.

The Compensation Committee regularly considers the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. If accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

Raul Alvarez, Chair

Anthony DiNovi

Sandra Horbach

Mark Nunnelly

Joseph Uva

20152016 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation paid to or earned by our named executive officers for fiscal years 2016, 2015 2014 and 2013:2014:

 

Name and Principal
Position

 Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
 Total
($)
  Year Salary
($)(1)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards
($)(2)
 Option
Awards
($)(3)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
 All Other
Compensation
($)(5)
 Total
($)
 

Nigel Travis

  2015   $ 1,000,000           $ 3,341,637   $      1,058,365   $          20,902   $5,420,904    2016  $1,019,231     $ 1,002,699  $ 2,336,597  $983,425  $          13,084  $5,355,035 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  2014   $990,385       $ 5,691,420   $ 2,945,316   $555,682   $22,000   $  10,204,803    2015  $1,000,000        $3,341,637  $        1,058,365  $20,902  $5,420,904 
 2013   $932,885           $ 2,380,392   $950,000   $25,481   $4,288,758    2014  $990,385     $5,691,420  $2,945,316  $555,682  $22,000  $  10,204,803 

Paul Carbone

  2015   $455,385       $999,976   $799,383   $327,224   $17,994   $2,599,963    2016  $502,885     $254,987  $594,438  $368,834  $15,907  $1,737,052 
Chief Financial Officer  2014   $412,116           $800,133   $142,398   $19,059   $1,373,705    2015  $455,385     $999,976  $799,383  $327,224  $17,994  $2,599,963 
 2013   $400,000           $426,487   $253,300   $19,162   $1,098,949   2014  $412,116        $800,133  $142,398  $19,059  $1,373,705 

Paul Twohig

 2015   $600,000           $1,253,113   $432,968   $20,259   $2,306,340  

President, Dunkin’

Donuts U.S. and Canada

 2014   $580,769           $2,980,206   $248,068   $22,558   $3,831,601  
 2016  $175,000  $ 650,000  $3,362,474        $361,452  $4,548,926 

President, Dunkin’

Donuts U.S. and Canada

 2013   $500,000           $753,791   $352,700   $27,343   $1,633,835          

John Costello

 2015   $600,000           $999,227   $396,068   $18,731   $2,014,026  
President, Global Marketing and Innovation 2014   $586,539       $1,400,050   $1,000,171   $223,786   $17,359   $3,227,904  
 2013   $530,000           $753,791   $323,717   $20,415   $1,627,922  

Paul Twohig

 2016  $611,539     $374,999  $873,852  $326,475  $22,167  $2,209,031 
Former President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada 2015  $600,000        $1,253,113  $432,968  $20,259  $2,306,340 
 2014  $580,769        $2,980,206  $248,068  $22,558  $3,831,601 
       

William Mitchell

 2015   $472,116           $999,227   $415,372   $15,746   $1,902,461   2016  $504,808     $254,987  $594,438  $299,065  $10,282  $1,663,580 
President, International (6)         2015  $472,116        $999,227  $415,372  $10,558  $1,897,272 

 

 

 

(1)Amounts shown in this column are not reduced to reflect the named executive officer’s elections, if any, to defer receipt of salary into either of the Deferred Compensation Plan or the 401(k) Plan. Base salaries earned in fiscal 2016 were based on a53-week fiscal year.
(2)The amounts shown in this column represent the dollar amounts of the aggregate grant date fair value of performance-based and time basedtime-based restricted stock and stock unit awards determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect actual amounts that may be paid to or realized by the named executive officers and exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. With respect to time-based restricted stock units and PSUs granted in 2016, the underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. With respect to PSUs granted to the named executive officers in 2016, the aggregate grant date fair value was determined based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions associated with such awards at the date of grant. For the PSUs, the aggregate grant date fair value of these awards, assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved, is $2,005,398 for Mr. Travis, $509,974 for Mr. Carbone, $2,800,068 for Mr. Hoffmann, $749,998 for Mr. Twohig and $509,974 for Mr. Mitchell. With respect to the performance-based restricted stock award granted to Mr. Travis in 2014, the aggregate grant date fair value was determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation model to reflect the probable outcomeimpact of the performance conditions associatescondition in accordance with such award. The award was valued based onASC Topic 718, resulting in a Monte Carlo grant date fair value of $37.94 per share. The aggregate grant date fair value of this award, assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved and based on the underlying stock price at the date of grant, is $7,750,500.
(3)

The amounts shown in this column represent the dollar amounts of the aggregate grant date fair value of stock option awards determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect actual amounts that may be paid to or realized by the named executive officers and exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. With respect to the options granted in 2015,2016, the underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. With respect to options granted in 2015, the underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial

statements for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2015, included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2015. With respect to options granted in 2014, the underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014, included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014. With respect to options granted in 2013, the underlying valuation assumptions are discussed in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013.
(4)Amounts shown in this column represent the named executive officer’s bonus payouts pursuant to the Annual Plan. These payout amounts were based on the attainment of certain pre-established performance targets. Please refer to the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of named executive officer compensation—Short-term incentive plan” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 20152016 compensation—Short-term incentive awards” above.

(5)Amounts shown in this column consist of the following items, as applicable to each named executive officer:

 

Name and Principal

Position

 Year Flexible
Allowance
and Event
Tickets
($)(i)
 Company-
Paid
Premiums for
LTD Coverage
($)
 Personal Use
of Company
Vehicle
($)(ii)
 Executive
Physicals
($)
 401(k) Company
Match
Contributions
($)
 Total
($)
  Year Flexible
Allowance
and Event
Tickets
($)(i)
 Company-
Paid
Premiums for
LTD Coverage
($)
 Personal Use
of Company
Vehicle
($)(ii)
 Relocation
/ Living
Expenses

($)(iii)
 Executive
Physicals
($)
 401(k) Company
Match
Contributions
($)
 Total
($)
 

Nigel Travis

 2015   $      4,060       $        3,992   $        2,250   $        10,600   $    20,902   2016  $        1,072     $1,412        $10,600  $13,084 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 2014   $3,920       $4,980   $2,700   $10,400   $22,000    2015  $4,060     $3,992     $        2,250  $        10,600  $20,902 
 2013   $3,400       $9,731   $2,150   $10,200   $25,481    2014  $3,920     $        4,980     $2,700  $10,400  $22,000 

Paul Carbone

 2015   $2,320   $            2,642   $32   $2,400   $10,600   $17,994   2016  $2,144  $2,642  $521        $10,600  $15,907 

Chief Financial Officer

 2014   $2,240   $2,642   $927   $2,850   $10,400   $19,059    2015  $2,320  $            2,642  $32     $2,400  $10,600  $17,994 

Chief Financial

Officer

 2014  $2,240  $2,642  $927     $2,850  $10,400  $19,059 
 2013   $2,480   $2,422   $860   $3,200   $10,200   $19,162  

David Hoffmann

 2016        $132  $361,320        $        361,452 
President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada        

Paul Twohig

 2015   $2,320   $5,447   $1,892       $10,600   $20,259   2016  $2,144  $5,447  $3,975        $10,600  $22,167 
President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada 2014   $2,240   $5,447   $4,471       $10,400   $22,558  
 2013   $4,080   $4,993   $8,070       $10,200   $27,343  

John Costello

 2015   $2,320   $2,515   $596   $2,700   $10,600   $18,731  
President, Global Marketing & Innovation 2014   $2,240   $2,515   $2,204       $10,400   $17,359  
 2013   $2,080   $2,609   $3,426   $2,100   $10,200   $20,415  
Former President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada  

2015

2014

 

 

 $

$

2,320

2,240

 

 

 $

$

5,447

5,447

 

 

 $

$

1,892

4,471

 

 

  


 

 

  


 

 

 $

$

10,600

10,400

 

 

 $

$

20,259

22,558

 

 

 

William Mitchell

 2015   $2,320   $2,826           $10,600   $15,746   2016  $2,144  $2,826           $5,312  $10,282 

President, International

         2015  $2,320  $2,826           $5,412  $10,558 

 

(i)Amounts shown reflect the face value of tickets to sporting events that were provided to our named executive officers.
(ii)Amounts shown are calculated based on the incremental costs to the Company of using a Company vehicle to transport the named executive officer from Canton, Massachusetts to Logan Airport in Boston, Massachusetts, calculated by taking into account the cost to the companyCompany of paying for a driver for these trips, based on the driver’s hourly rate, costs associated with fuel and maintenance of the vehicle related to such trips and the cost of applicable tolls, but not including any costs otherwise associated with the ownership or maintenance of the Company vehicle as these are costs that would otherwise have been incurred by the company regardless of this personal use.

(6)(iii)Amount shown reflects $29,955 in expenses incurred by the Company in connection with Mr. Mitchell becameHoffmann’s relocation to Massachusetts to commence his employment with the Company, together with a named executive officerreimbursement by the Company of $166,666 in 2015living expenses incurred by Mr. Hoffmann’s family, who will remain overseas until the end of the current school year, reimbursement of international medical insurance premiums for Mr. Hoffmann and as a result, only information forhis family of $6,703 and gross up of the most recent fiscal year is included in this table.tax on such reimbursements of $157,996.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

         All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number

of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(2)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(3)
  Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(4)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Awards
($)(5)
        All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(3)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(4)
  Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
(5)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)(6)
 
   Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
    

 

 

 

Potential Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan

 

 

 

 

Potential Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan

 

Name

 Type of Award Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)(1)
 Target
($)(1)
 Maximum
($)(1)
  Type of Award Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)(1)
 Target
($)(1)
 Maximum
($)(1)
 Threshold
(#)(2)
 Target
(#)(2)
 Maximum
(#)(2)
 

Nigel Travis

 Annual Incentive  275,000   1,100,000   2,475,00       Annual Incentive  275,000  1,100,000  2,475,00        
 

 

Stock Options

 2/12/2015       374,707   $47.39   3,341,637   

 

Stock Options

 2/23/2016         307,852  $44.35  2,336,597 
 

 

Performance
Stock Units

 2/23/2016     5,276  21,105  42,210     1,002,699 

Paul Carbone

 Annual Incentive  85,024   340,096   765,217       Annual Incentive  92,488  369,952  832,392        
 

 

Stock Options

 2/12/2015       93,677   $47.39   799,383   

 

Stock Options

 2/23/2016         81,284  $44.35  594,438 
 

 

Performance
Stock Units

 2/23/2016     1,342  5,367  10,734     254,987 

David Hoffmann

 Restricted

Stock Units

 10/3/2016        40,027    1,962,440 
 

 

Restricted Stock

 2/12/2015      21,101     999,976   

 

Performance
Stock Units

 10/3/2016     7,136  28,543  57,086     1,400,034 

Paul Twohig

 Annual Incentive  112,500   450,000   1,012,500       Annual Incentive  112,500  450,000  1,012,500        
 

 

Stock Options

 2/12/2015       140,515   $47.39   1,253,113   

 

Stock Options

 2/23/2016         115,132  $44.35  873,852 
 

 

Performance
Stock Units

 2/23/2016     1,973  7,893  15,786     374,999 

John Costello

 Annual Incentive  112,500   450,000   1,012,500      
 

 

Stock Options

 2/12/2015       117,096   $47.39   999,227  

William Mitchell

 Annual Incentive  82,519   330,077   742,673       Annual Incentive  92,849  371,394  835,637        
 

 

Stock Options

 2/12/2015       117,096   $47.39   999,227   

 

Stock Options

 2/23/2016         81,284  $44.35  594,438 
 

 

Performance
Stock Units

 2/23/2016     1,342  5,367  10,734     254,987 

 

 

(1)These figures represent threshold, target and maximum bonus opportunities under the Annual Plan. The actual amount of the bonus earned by each named executive officer for fiscal 20152016 is reported in the Summary Compensation Table. For a description of the performance targets relating to the Annual Plan, please refer to the sections titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of named executive officer compensation- compensation—Short-term incentive plan” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 20152016 compensation—Short-term incentive awards” above.
(2)These figures represent threshold, target and maximum potential future payouts under the PSUs granted to each of our named executive officers in fiscal 2016. The PSUs are eligible to vest based on the achievement of certain performance goals over a three-year performance period, as described below.
(3)Represents a supplementaltwo time-based restricted stock awardRSU awards granted to Mr. CarboneHoffmann that will vest based on his continued service with the Company, as described below, including an RSU award with a grant date fair value of approximately $562,500 (11,473 RSUs) that Mr. Hoffmann elected to receive in lieu of a cash payment of $450,000, as described in the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Fiscal 2016 compensation—Compensation of our other Named Executive Officers” above. ThisBoth awards of time-based restricted stock award wasunits were granted under the Company’s 20112015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(3)(4)Represents stock options granted to our named executive officers. These stock options were granted under the Company’s 20112015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan. All stock option awards in this column are options to purchase shares of our common stock, have a seven-year term and are subject to service-based vesting, as described above.below.
(4)(5)The exercise price of stock options is the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. The exercise price of the stock options granted to our named executive officers was determined using the closing price of a share of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the date of grant.
(5)(6)Amounts shown in this column with respect to stock options, reflect the fair value of the stock optionequity awards on the date of grant determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718. These amounts do not reflect actual amounts paid to or realized by the named executive officers and exclude the effect of estimated forfeitures. The underlying valuation assumptions for option awards are further discussed in Note 14See notes (2) and (3) to our consolidated financial statements for fiscal year ended December 26, 2015.the Summary Compensation Table.

Narrative disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Each of our named executive officers is party to an employment agreement (in the case of Mr. Travis) or an offer letter (in the case of all other named executive officers) that provides for a base salary and other benefits. AllWith the exception of Mr. Hoffmann who did not yet meet eligibility requirements to participate in the Annual Plan and certain benefit plans due to the timing of his hire date, all of our named executive officers were eligible to participate in the Deferred Compensation Plan, the Annual Plan, and our long-term incentive plans and our benefit plans and programs for all or a portion of fiscal 2015.2016. Each of our named executive officers’ annual incentive plan opportunity (including Mr. Travis’ pursuant to his employment agreement)agreement and Mr. Hoffmann’s pursuant to his offer letter) is established and determined under the Annual Plan, as more fully described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

As described in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, Mr. Hoffmann is entitled to reimbursement of relocation costs associated with his and his family’s move to the United States and up to three family visits, as well as tax preparation and support for tax years impacted by his overseas assignment with his prior employer. He is also entitled to certain living expense-related payments in an aggregate amount of $499,998 to help ease the financial burden associated with Mr. Hoffmann’s family remaining overseas while he is no longer working there, together with agross-up for related taxes.

As described above, in fiscal 2016, each named executive officer other than Mr. Hoffmann was granted stock options that vest based on continued employment and PSUs that vest based on both continued employment and the achievement of certain performance goals. Mr. Hoffmann was granted RSUs that vest based on continued employment and PSUs. Stock options granted in fiscal 2016 vest in four equal installments, generally subject to the executive’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. A portion of the PSU awards granted in fiscal 2016 to our named executive officers other than Mr. Hoffmann will be eligible to vest if the Company’s total shareholder return meets or exceeds a specified total shareholder return relative to the total shareholder return for the companies included in the S&P 500 over a three-year performance period and a portion will be eligible to vest if the Company achieves a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income, generally subject to continued employment through the third anniversary of the date the award was granted. RSUs granted in fiscal 2016 to Mr. Hoffmann vest in three equal installments, generally subject to Mr. Hoffmann’s continued employment on the applicable vesting date. PSUs granted to Mr. Hoffmann will be eligible to vest based on the achievement of a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income from our fiscal 2016 results, generally subject to Mr. Hoffmann’s continued employment on the third anniversary of the date of grant.

The severance arrangements with our named executive officers and the effect of a change in control on their outstanding optionsequity awards are described below under “Potential payments upon termination or change of control”.

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
(2)
 Option
Expiration
Date
(3)
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That

Have
Not
Vested
(4)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(5)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(5)($)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised

Options (#)
Exercisable
(1)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(1)
 Option
Exercise
Price ($)
(2)
 Option
Expiration
Date
(3)
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(4)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(5)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(6)
 Equity
Incentive

Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(5)($)
 

Nigel Travis

 875,427       3.02   2/23/2020       875,427     3.02  2/23/2020     
 180,000  60,000  37.26  2/12/2023     
 126,646  126,647  51.67  2/28/2021     
 120,000   120,000   37.26   2/12/2023       93,676  281,031  47.39  2/12/2022     
 63,323   189,970   51.67   2/28/2021             150,000(7)  8,343,000 
     374,707   47.39   2/12/2022          307,852  44.35  2/23/2023     
       150,000(6)   6,354,000         21,105  1,132,412 

Paul Carbone

 12,976       3.02   2/23/2020       3,172     3.02  2/23/2020     
     3,504   7.31   3/9/2021       3,504     7.31  3/9/2021     
 75,000   25,000   33.18   6/8/2022       100,000     33.18  6/8/2022     
     21,500   37.26   2/12/2023       10,750  10,750  37.26  2/12/2023     
 20,263   60,791   51.67   2/28/2021       40,527  40,527  51.67  2/28/2021     
     93,677   47.39   2/12/2022       23,419  70,258  47.39  2/12/2022     
     21,101   893,838         21,101  1,154,225   
    81,284  44.35  2/23/2023     

Paul Twohig

     6,569   7.31   3/9/2021      
 15,000       25.18   12/12/2021             5,367  288,480 
 38,000   38,000   37.26   2/12/2023      

David Hoffmann

     40,027  2,099,016   
 30,395   91,186   51.67   2/28/2021             28,543(8)  1,505,066 
     115,000   51.67   2/28/2021      
     140,515   47.39   2/12/2022      

John Costello

     8,757   7.31   3/09/2021      

Paul Twohig

 57,000  19,000  37.26  2/12/2023     
 25,000       25.18   12/12/2021       60,790  60,791  51.67  2/28/2021     
     38,000   37.26   2/12/2023       57,500  57,500  51.67  2/28/2021     
 25,329   75,989   51.67   2/28/2021       35,128  105,387  47.39  2/12/2022     
     117,096   47.39   2/12/2022          115,132  44.35  2/23/2023     
     27,096   1,147,787           7,893  425,255 

William Mitchell

     18,828   7.31   3/09/2021       13,180  0  7.31  3/9/2021     
 28,500   28,500   37.26   2/12/2023       42,750  14,250  37.26  2/12/2023     
 20,263   60,791   51.67   2/28/2021       40,527  40,527  51.67  2/28/2021     
     117,096   47.39   2/12/2022       29,274  87,822  47.39  2/12/2022     
 0  81,284  44.35  2/23/2023     
       5,367  288,480 

 

 

(1)Reflects stock options that vest based on service-based vesting conditions. Stock option grants made after our initial public offering in 2011 (our “IPO”) vest in annual equal installments over four years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, generally subject to the named executive officer remaining continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting date. Stock option grants made on or before our IPO vest in equal annual installments over five years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, subject to the named executive officer remaining continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting date.
(2)

The exercise price of stock options is equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the grant date. This was $3.02 in the case of grants made on February 23, 2010 and $7.31 in the case of grants made on March 9, 2011, in each case, after adjustment in connection with the reverse stock split that occurred immediately prior to our IPO. Prior to our IPO, fair market value was determined by the Board based on a

 based on a valuation provided by an independent third-party valuation firm. The exercise price for grants made subsequent to our IPO was determined using the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on the respective date of grant.
(3)All options granted before February 28, 2014 have aten-year term. Options granted on or after February 28, 2014 have a seven-year term.
(4)Mr. Carbone’s supplemental restricted stock award will vest in two equal parts on February 12, 2018 and February 12, 2019, generally subject to Mr. Carbone remaining continuously employed by us through the applicable vesting date. Mr. Costello’s supplemental restricted stock awardHoffmann’s RSU awards will vest in full on July 31, 2016,equal installments over three years, beginning with the first anniversary of the grant date, generally subject to Mr. CostelloHoffmann remaining continuously employed by us through thatthe applicable vesting date.
(5)Amounts in this column have been calculated by multiplying the number of sharesPSUs subject to the applicable award, including dividend equivalent units earned on such shares but not yet paid, by $42.36$52.44 which was the closing price of our common stock on December 24, 2015,30, 2016, which was the last business day of our 20152016 fiscal year. In the case of Mr. Travis’s February 28, 2014 supplemental performance-based restricted stock award and Mr. Carbone’s February 12, 2015 supplemental restricted stock award, amounts include $477,000 and $47,688, respectively, in cash dividends earned but not paid as of December 31, 2016.
(6)Amounts in this column represent performance stock awards or PSUs, as applicable, and assume achievement of performance at target levels. Other than Mr. Travis’ 2014 performance-based restricted stock award and Mr. Hoffmann’s PSU award that was granted at the time of his hiring in October 2016, each of which is described below, amounts shown in this column represent PSUs granted in fiscal 2016. A portion of the PSUs that will be eligible to vest based on the achievement of a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income and a portion of the PSUs will be eligible to vest based on the achievement of the Company’s TSR relative to the TSR of the companies that make up the S&P 500 over a three-year performance period. PSUs, to the extent earned, will vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, generally subject to the executive’s continued employment on this date. The number of shares issuable under the relative TSR portion of the PSUs will be determined based on the level at which the goals are achieved and can range from 0% of the shares subject to the award if the Company’s TSR percentile rank is less than the 30th percentile of the S&P 500, to 100% of the target award (if the TSR percentile rank is at the 52.5th percentile) to a maximum of 200% (if the TSR percentile rank is at or greater than the 75th percentile).
(7)Mr. Travis’s supplemental performance-based restricted stock award is scheduled to vest on December 31, 2018, generally subject to Mr. Travis remaining continuously employed by the Company through that date, provided that certain performance conditions are met. Mr. Travis will vest in 75,000 shares of restricted stock if the Company’s total shareholder return is equal to or greater than the median total shareholder return for the companies thethat comprise the S&P 500 from March 31, 2014 through the end of any calendar quarter in 2018. If the Company’s total shareholder return exceeds the median total shareholder return of the companies that comprise the S&P 500 by an amount that is equal to or greater than a percentage calculated by assuming a 4% annual growth rate (with annual compounding) (the “hurdle rate”) over the applicable measurement period (i.e. March 31, 2014 through the applicable quarter end in 2018), Mr. Travis will vest in 150,000 shares of restricted stock. If the total shareholder return over the applicable measurement period is greater than the median by a percentage that is less than the hurdle rate, the number of shares of restricted stock that vest (i.e., a number between 75,000 and 150,000) will be determined by interpolating on a straight line basis between the median and the median percentage plus the hurdle rate.
(8)Mr. Hoffmann’s PSU award is eligible to vest after three years of continuous employment, based on the achievement of a three-year compound annual growth rate target for adjusted operating income from our fiscal 2016 results.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The table below shows information regarding the exercise of stock options by named executive officers during 2015.2016.

 

  OPTION EXERCISES 
  OPTION EXERCISES 

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
   Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
   Value Realized
on Exercise
($)(1)
 

Nigel Travis

   250,000     12,065,683          

Paul Carbone

   91,161     3,760,014     9,804    432,106 

David Hoffmann

        

Paul Twohig

   80,351     3,380,223     21,569    584,818 

John Costello

   117,081     3,905,331  

William Mitchell

   43,481     2,035,479     5,648    217,790 

 

 

(1)The dollar amounts shown this column for option awards are determined by multiplying (i) the number of shares of our common stock to which the exercise of the option related by (ii) the difference between the open marketper-share closing sale price of our common stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options. No stock awards held by our named executive officers vested during 2015.2016.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 

Name

  Executive
Contributions in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year(2)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year(3)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End(4)
   Executive
Contributions in Last
Fiscal Year(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year(2)
   Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year(3)
   Aggregate
Withdrawals /
Distributions
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End(4)
 

Nigel Travis

  $                372,250           $                    (43,486      $  1,566,690    $                524,207         $                    122,541    (117,727 $  2,095,711 

Paul Carbone

             (7,683       134,342             1,857      136,199 

David Hoffmann

                   

Paul Twohig

   60,000          (4,957       171,860     2,308        16,204      190,372 

John Costello

                        

William Mitchell

                                           

 

 

 

(1)All amounts contributed by our named executive officers in the last fiscal year have also been reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)No Company contributions were made into this plan for fiscal 20152016 on behalf of our named executive officers.
(3)Reflects market-based earnings (losses) on amounts credited to participants under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Investment choices are available within the Deferred Compensation Plan and the Company provides credits or debits to deferred compensation accounts based on the performance of the investment choices selected.
(4)Amounts reported in this column, excluding earnings, were previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table.

As noted above, we maintain twonon-qualified deferred compensation plans—the NQDC Plan I and the NQDC Plan II, which we refer to collectively as the “Deferred Compensation Plan”. We adopted the NQDC Plan II effective as of January 1, 2015, and it replaces the NQDC Plan I with respect to deferrals made by participants after its effective date. The NQDC Plan I and the NQDC Plan II are substantially similar. The Deferred Compensation Plan is available to executives and senior management of the Company, as well as the Company’snon-employee directors. Under the Deferred

Compensation Plan, our named executive officers and other eligible employees are permitted to elect to defer up to 50% of base salary and up to 100% of annual cash incentive awards each year. Although we have the discretion to provide matching credits under the plan, no matching credits were provided during fiscal 2015.2016. All amounts credited to an employee participant’s account under the plan are notionally invested in mutual funds or other investments available in the market. We do not provide above-market or preferential earnings on deferred compensation. Amounts credited under the Deferred Compensation Plan are generally distributed in a lump sum upon a participant’s separation from service, disability or a date selected by the participant (at least three years after the year of deferral). A participant who separates from service at or after age 40 may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or in installments and may defer commencement of distributions following separation up to age 65. We have established a rabbi trust to assist us in meeting a portion of our obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan. We have appointed a trustee who, upon a change in control, will administer the trust, and we will fund the trust in an amount sufficient to satisfy all obligations under the plan. In addition, during the12-month period following a change in control, we will continue to maintain the notional investment options available under the Deferred Compensation Plan including, if applicable, any fixed rate fund (using an annual interest equivalent factor equal to the highest factor in effect during the 24 months prior to the change in control). The principal difference between the NQDC Plan I and the NQDC Plan II is that the NQDC Plan II includes a provision for a “make-up”“make-up” match in an amount equal to any 401(k) Plan Company matching contributions that a named executive officer is required to forego as a result of elective contributions of salary to NQDC Plan II. In order for

this to occur, a participant must elect to defer enough compensation under the NQDC Plan II such that his or her compensation for purposes of the Company’s matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan falls below the applicable limit under Code section 401(a)(17). This limit in 20152016 was $265,000. No named executive officer received a “make-up”“make-up” match in 20152016 under the NQDC Plan II.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

Each of our named executive officers is entitled to receive certain benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment.

Employment agreement with Mr. Travis. Under Mr. Travis’ employment agreement, as amended, if his employment is terminated other than for cause or performance-based cause or if he resigns for good reason, he will be entitled to receive alump-sum payment equal to two times the average annual base salary paid to him during the two years preceding the date his employment terminates. He will also be entitled to apro-rated bonus for the year in which such termination occurs, determined based on actual performance. In addition, Mr. Travis will be entitled to reimbursement for health insurance premiums for participation in our medical and dental plans for eighteen months following employment termination. If his employment is terminated for performance-based cause, he will be entitled to receive alump-sum payment equal to one times his annual base salary at the time his employment terminates.terminates, as well as any bonus earned for the fiscal year preceding that in which termination occurs, but unpaid on the date of termination. Performance-based cause is defined in Mr. Travis’ agreement generally as a failure by Mr. Travis to perform his duties to the reasonable standards set by the Board, and where this failure does not rise to the level of “cause.”

All other Named Executive Officers. Each of Messrs. Carbone, Hoffmann, Twohig, Costello and Mitchell is entitled to certain severance benefits under his offer letter, as amended. In the event of a termination of employment without cause (or , in the case of Mr. Hoffmann, his resignation for good reason), each executive will receive severance in an amount equal to twelve months of base salary, payable in the

same manner and at the same time as our payroll is customarily paid. In addition, if the executive makes a timely election to receive COBRA health care continuation coverage, it is our current practice to pay a portion of the executive’s monthly COBRA premium for the first three months following the date of termination in an amount equal to the premiums paid by an active employee for such coverage immediately prior to the termination date. It is also our current practice to pay the cost of six months of outplacement services for each executive, which such arrangement may be extended by us for an additional six months, in our discretion.

Each named executive officer (including Mr. Travis), upon his termination of employment, is also entitled to receive any accrued but unpaid salary and vacation.

Each named executive officer’s right to receive severance payments and benefits is conditioned upon his signing and not revoking a full release of claims in favor of the Company.

Restrictive covenants. Under the terms of their respective employment agreements or offer letters, each of Messrs. Travis, Carbone, Hoffmann, Twohig Costello and Mitchell has agreed to confidentiality obligations during and after employment. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Travis has agreed tonon-competition andnon-solicitation obligations during and for two years following employment termination. Under his letter agreement, Mr. Twohig has agreed tonon-competition andnon-solicitation obligations during and for two years following his employment. Each of Messrs. Carbone, Costello,Hoffmann and Mitchell has agreed tonon-competition andnon-solicitation obligations during and for twelve months following employment.

Termination of employment provisions under long-term incentive awardsawards..

2016 PSU Awards.    Except as provided below, if the employment of a named executive officer terminates prior to the three year anniversary of the grant date, the PSUs will immediately be forfeited. If a named executive officer’s employment with us is terminated (i) by reason of his death or (ii) due to his disability, or (iii) in the case of PSUs granted to Mr. Hoffmann by the Company, without cause or by him for good reason, in each case prior to the applicable vesting date of each award (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), the PSUs will not terminate upon such termination and instead remain outstanding and eligible to become earned pursuant to the terms of the award and to vest, to the extent earned, on the three year anniversary of the grant date for PSUs granted to named executive officers other than Mr. Hoffmann and at the end of the three-year performance period for PSUs granted to Mr. Hoffmann.

Mr. Hoffmann’s 2016 Hiring RSU Awards.    If Mr. Hoffmann’s employment with us (i) is terminated by the Company other than for cause or due to his disability, (ii) is terminated by reason of Mr. Hoffmann’s death, or (iii) is terminated by Mr. Hoffmann for good reason, in each case, prior to the applicable vesting dates of each award (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), all then-unvested RSUs subject to his stock awards upon hire will become vested on the applicable termination date.

Mr. Carbone’s 2015 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award.    If Mr. Carbone’s employment with us (i) is terminated by the Company other than for cause and other than for performance-based cause, or (2)(ii) is terminated by Mr. Carbone for good reason, in each case, prior to the applicable vesting dates of February 12, 2018 and February 12, 2019 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has

occurred), all then unvested restricted shares subject to his supplemental restricted stock award will become vested on the applicable termination date. If Mr. Carbone’s employment terminates due to his death or is terminated by the Company due to his disability prior to the applicable vesting dates of February 12, 2018 and February 12, 2019 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), the number of unvested restricted shares that become vested will bepro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 12, 2015 until the termination date.

Mr. Travis’s 2014 Supplemental Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award.    If Mr. Travis’s employment with us (i) is terminated by the Company other than for cause and other than for performance-based cause, (ii) terminates due to Mr. Travis’s death or is terminated by the Company due to Mr. Travis’s disability, or (iii) is terminated by Mr. Travis for good reason, in each case, prior to March 31, 2018 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), he will become vested in a number of restricted shares if the Company has achieved certain total shareholder return levels relative to the S&P 500 from March 31, 2014 through the termination date. Under those circumstances, Mr. Travis would only become vested in restricted shares if the Company’s total shareholder return over the measurement period is equal to or greater than the median total shareholder return of the S&P 500 over the same period, in which case he will become vested in 75,000 restricted shares. If the Company’s total shareholder return exceeds the median total shareholder return of the S&P 500 by an amount that is equal to or greater than a percentage calculated by assuming a 4% annual growth rate (with annual compounding) (as noted above, the “hurdle rate”) over the measurement period, which is the same assumed annual growth rate as determines vesting if Mr. Travis remains employed through March 31, 2018, Mr. Travis will vest in 150,000 restricted shares. If the Company’s total shareholder return over the measurement period is greater than the median total shareholder return for the S&P 500 over the same period, but exceeds the median by a percentage that is less than the hurdle rate, the number of restricted shares that vest (i.e., a number between 75,000 and 150,000) will be determined by interpolating on a straight line basis between the median and the median percentage plus the hurdle rate. In the event that Mr. Travis’s employment with us terminates due to his death or disability prior to March 31, 2018, he will become vested in a number of restricted shares determined in the same manner as described above, except that the number of shares vesting will bepro-rated to reflect the number of days that have elapsed from March 31, 2014 through the termination date.

Mr. Twohig’s 2014 Supplemental Stock Option Award.    If Mr. Twohig’s employment (i) is terminated by the Company other than for cause and other than for performance-based cause, or (ii) is terminated by Mr. Twohig for good reason, in each case, prior to December 31, 2016 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), then his supplemental stock option award will become vested as to 50% of the total number of shares subject to the stock option on the applicable termination date. If the qualifying termination occurs between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, then the stock option will become vested in full on the applicable termination date. If Mr. Twohig’s employment terminates due to his death or is terminated by the Company due to his disability prior to December 31, 2017 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), the number of shares subject to the stock option that become vested will bepro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 28, 2014 until the termination date.

Mr. Costello’s 2014 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award.    If Mr. Costello’s employment with us (i) is terminated by the Company other than for cause and other than for performance-based cause, or (2) is terminated by Mr. Costello for good reason, in each case, prior to July 31, 2016 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), then all unvested restricted shares subject to his supplemental restricted stock award will become vested on the applicable termination date. If Mr. Costello’s employment terminates due to his death or is terminated by the Company due to his disability prior to July 31, 2016 (and regardless of whether or not a change in control has occurred), the number of unvested restricted shares that become vested will be pro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 28, 2014 until the termination date.

Change in control

All outstanding stock optionsequity awards held by our named executive officers are subject to change in control vesting provisions, as described below.

Options Granted under the 2011 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive PlanMr. Carbone’s 2015 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award and Mr. Hoffmann’s 2016 Hiring RSU Awards.    All outstanding option awards held by our named executive officers that were granted under the 2011 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, includingUpon a change in control, if each of Mr. Twohig’s 2014 supplemental option award, provide that, if such optionsCarbone’s and Mr. Hoffmann’s restricted shares or RSUs, as applicable, are assumed or continued in connection with athe change in control and the named executive officer’shis employment is terminated by the Company (or its successor) without cause or the named executive officerhe terminates his employment for good reason within 18 months of the change in control, such optionsrestricted shares or RSUs, as applicable, will immediately vest in full. The award agreementsagreement also provideprovides that if such optionsrestricted shares or RSUs, as applicable, are not assumed or continued in connection with a change in control, they will vest in full upon the change in control.

Mr. Carbone’s 2015 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award and Mr. Costello’s 2014 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award.    Upon a change in control, if Mr. Carbone’s restricted shares are assumed or continued in connection with the change in control and Mr. Carbone’s employment is terminated by the Company (or its successor) without cause or Mr. Carbone terminates his employment for good reason within 18 months of the change in control, such restricted shares will immediately vest in full. The award agreement also provides that if such restricted shares are not assumed or continued in connection with a change in control, they will vest in full upon the change in control. The same terms apply to Mr. Costello’s 2014 Supplemental Restricted Stock Award.

Mr. Travis’s 2014 Supplemental Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award.    Upon a change in control, Mr. Travis will become eligible to vest in the full number of shares subject to his supplemental performance-based restricted stock award but will not actually vest in the restricted shares unless Mr. Travis remains continuously employed with us through the vesting date, unless the award is not assumed or continued in connection with the change in control, in which case the restricted shares will vest in full upon the change in control. If Mr. Travis’s employment is terminated after the change in control date but prior to the vesting date, the termination provisions described above will apply to the full number of shares that became eligible to vest in connection with the change in control.

Options Granted under the 2006 Equity2011 and 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive PlanPlans.    With respect to eachAll outstanding option grant awardedawards held by our named executive officers that were granted under our 2006 Equitythe 2011 and 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan, eligible participantsPlans, provide that, if such options are entitled to accelerated vesting, immediately uponassumed or continued in connection with a change in control of 50% of their then-unvested stock options. Any remaining unvested stock options will vest onand the first anniversarynamed executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company (or its successor) without cause or the named executive officer terminates his employment for good reason within 18 months of the change in control, (so longsuch options will immediately vest in full. The award agreements also provide that if such options are not assumed or continued in connection with a change in control, they will vest in full upon the change in control.

PSUs Granted under the 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan.    Upon a change in control, the Compensation Committee will determine the extent to which the performance objective(s) underlying the PSU awards have been met as of the participant remains employed through that date). While the valuedate of such accelerationchange in control and will determine the number of PSUs earned under the awards, if any. The number of earned PSUs, if any, will continue to vest based solely on time and will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date (or if the change in control occurs after the end of the performance period but before the vesting date, upon the occurrence of the change in control), subject to the named executive officer remaining in continuous employment through such date, unless the award is includednot assumed or continued in connection with the tables below, all option grants awarded under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan were fully vested aschange in control, in which case the PSUs will vest in full upon the change in control. If the award is assumed or continued in connection with the change in control, and the named executive officer’s employment is terminated by the Company (or its successor) without cause or the named executive officer terminates his employment for good reason within 18 months of March 2016.the change in control, the earned PSUs, if any, will vest in full upon such termination of employment. In the event that the named executive officer’s employment is terminated due to his death or his employment is terminated by the Company due to his disability prior to the end of the applicable performance period and a change in control occurs, the earned PSUs, if any, will vest upon the change in control.

As described above under “Nonqualified deferred compensation”“Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”, a change in control will have certain consequences under our Deferred Compensation Plan, including a requirement that we contribute additional amounts to the rabbi trust established to satisfy its obligations under this plan.

We do not provide tax “gross-ups”“gross-ups” on amounts payable in connection with a change of control that are subject to an excise tax on golden parachute payments.

Summary of potential payments

The following tables summarize the payments that would have been made to our named executive officers upon the occurrence of a qualifying termination of employment or change in control, assuming that each named executive officer’s termination of employment with our company or a change in control of the Company occurred on December 24, 201530, 2016 (the last business day of our fiscal year). If a termination of employment had occurred on this date, severance payments and benefits would have been determined, for Mr. Travis, under his employment agreement in effect on such date and, for the other named executive officers, under their respective offer letters, as in effect on such date. Amounts shown do not include (i) accrued but unpaid salary or bonus and vested benefits and (ii) other benefits earned or accrued by the named executive officer during his employment that are available to all salaried employees and that do not discriminate in scope, terms or operations in favor of executive officers.

None of our named executive officers was entitled to receive any severance payments or benefits upon a voluntary termination (including retirement) or a termination due to death, disability or cause on December 24, 2015,30, 2016, except for earned bybut unpaid salary, accrued and vested benefits and benefits under any applicable insurance policies.policies, as described in the table below for Mr. Hoffmann, and with respect to outstanding PSUs in the case of a termination due to death or by the Company due to disability, which will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance.

 

Termination of Mr. Travis’ Employment (3)

 Cash Severance
(Lump-Sum)(2)
 Health
Benefit
 Total  Cash Severance
(Lump-Sum)
(1)
 Acceleration
of Unvested
Long-Term
Incentive
Awards

(2) (3)
 Health
Benefit
 Total 

Voluntary Termination for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination (other than for Cause or Performance-Based Cause)

 $    3,048,750   $        26,626   $3,075,376   $    2, 983,425     $        27,263  $3,010,688 

Involuntary Termination (for Performance-Based Cause)

 1,000,000           1,000,000   1,983,425            1,983,425 

Termination due to Death or Disability

 983,425  $321,900     1,305,325 

 

(1) Represents the amounts Mr. Travis would be entitled to pursuant to his employment agreement, as described above.

(2) Mr. Travis is eligible to receive a lump sum equal to two times his average annual base salary for the two calendar years preceding the termination, plus a pro-rated share of any annual bonus payment earned in the year of termination, pro-rated based on the date of termination. Since the table assumes termination on December 24, 2015,30, 2016, the last business day of the fiscal year, Mr. Travis would have received his full annual bonus payment. Mr. Travis’ 2014 performance-based restricted stock award becomes eligible to vest inpayment under the case of voluntary termination for good reason or involuntary termination other than for cause or performance-based cause but does not actually vest unless certain performance goals are achieved. Since those performance goals were not achieved as of December 26, 2015, no vesting would have occurred.Annual Plan.

(3) Upon his death or disability, Mr. Travis will be entitled to compensation earned but not yet paid. In addition, a (2) Apro-rata portion of Mr. Travis’ 2014 performance-based restricted stock award based on the number of days that elapsed between February 28, 2014 and December 26, 201530, 2016 becomes eligible to vest, but does not actually vest unless certain performance goals are achieved. Since those performance goals were not achieved as of December 26, 2015,30, 2016, no vesting would have occurred.

(3) In the event of termination due to death or disability, PSUs from Mr. Travis’s 2016 PSU award remain outstanding and eligible to become earned in accordance with the award terms and to vest on the vesting date. The number of earned PSUs, if any, will be prorated based on the number of the days that have elapsed in the vesting period from the date of grant to the date of such termination of employment (but not more than 1,096 days) over 1,096. Amounts in this column represent the fair market value of the awards on December 30, 2016, including 528 dividend equivalent units earned on such awards but not yet paid as of December 30, 2016,pro-rated by the 311 days that elapsed in the vesting period (311/1,096).

Termination by the
Company Other than
for Cause

 Cash Severance
(Salary
Continuation)

(1)
 Acceleration of
Unvested
Supplemental
Long-Term
Incentive Award
(2)
 Health and
Dental
Benefits (3)
 Outplacement
(4)
 Total  Cash Severance
(Salary
Continuation)
(1)
 Acceleration of
Unvested
Supplemental
Long-Term
Incentive Awards
(2)
 Health and
Dental
Benefits (3)
 Outplacement
(4)
 Total 

Paul Carbone

 $            465,000   $893,838   $        4,184   $          20,000   $1,383,022   $            500,000  $          1,154,225  $        4,417  $        20,000  $1,678,642 

David Hoffmann (5)

 700,000  2,099,016  4,412  20,000  2,823,428 

Paul Twohig

 600,000       2,899   20,000   622,899   600,000  44,275  3,032  20,000  667,307 

John Costello

 600,000             1,147,787   2,899   20,000   1,770,686  

William Mitchell

 475,000       4,438   20,000   499,438   500,000     4,544  20,000  524,544 

 

(1) Represents twelve months of base salary continuation as per employment letters for Messrs. Carbone, Hoffmann, Twohig, Costello, and Mitchell.

(2) Mr. Carbone’s 2015supplemental award of restricted stock award would have vested in full pursuant to its terms if he experienced a qualifying termination of employment (as described above) on December 26, 2015.30, 2016. The amount shown above for Mr. Carbone represents the number of his restricted shares (21,101) subject to his supplemental award, multiplied by the closing price of a share of our common stock ($42.36)52.44) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 24, 2015. In the event that his employment had terminated due to his death or was terminated by the Company due to his disability30, 2016, plus $47,688 in cash dividends earned on such award but not yet paid as of December 26, 2015, the number30, 2016. Mr. Hoffmann’s hire grant of shares that became vested would have been pro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 12, 2015 through the termination date (i.e. 317 of 1,461 days in the vesting period), resulting in Mr. Carbone realizing acceleration value of $193,924. Half of Mr. Twohig’s 2014 supplemental option award of 115,000 stock options would have vested pursuant to its terms if he experienced a qualifying termination of employment (as described above) on December 26, 2015. In the event that his employment had terminated due to his death or was terminated by the Company due to his disability on December 26, 2015, the number of options that became vested would have been pro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 28, 2014 through the termination date. Because the exercise price of Mr. Twohig’s supplemental award ($51.67) was greater than the closing price of a share of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 24, 2015 ($42.36), no amount is reflected in the table above with respect to that acceleration. Mr. Costello’s 2014 restricted stock awardRSUs would have vested in full pursuant to its terms if he experienced a qualifying termination of employment (as described above) on December 26, 2015.30, 2016. The amount shown above for Mr. CostelloHoffmann represents the number of his restricted shares (27,096)RSUs (40,027) subject to his supplemental award,hire grant, multiplied by the closing price of a share of our common stock ($42.36)52.44) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 24, 2015. In the event that his employment30, 2016. If Mr. Twohig had terminated due to his death or wasbeen terminated by the Company due to his disabilitywithout cause or by him for good reason on December 26, 2015, the number30, 2016, half of shares that became vested would have been pro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 28,Mr. Twohig’s 2014 through the termination date (i.e. 666 of 884 days in the vesting period), resulting in Mr. Costello realizing acceleration value of $864,695). Mr. Costello’s supplemental award of restricted115,000 stock options would have vested. As of that date, the closing price of a share of our common stock ($52.44) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was greater than the exercise price of Mr. Twohig’s supplemental award ($51.67), therefore the amount reflected in the table above reflects the value of the award assuming Mr. Twohig exercised the vested in full pursuant to its terms if he experienced a qualifying termination of employment (as described above)options on December 26, 2015.that date.

(3) Represents the amount we would have paid under our current practice of paying for three months’ health and dental benefits for Messrs. Carbone, Hoffmann, Twohig, Costello and Mitchell.

(4) Represents the cost to us for six months’ outplacement services, which we would have paid under our current practice. Under an arrangement with the provider of outplacement services, the Company generally does not pay an additional fee if outplacement services are continued for an additional six months following the end of the firstsix-month period.

(5) For Mr. Hofmann, the amounts shown in the table also include payments in the event of resignation by Mr. Hoffmann for good reason, as such term is defined in his offer letter with the Company. Additionally, in the event of a termination by the Company other than for cause or a resignation by Mr. Hoffmann for good reason, his outstanding PSUs will remain outstanding and eligible to vest based on actual performance.

Change in Control/Change in Control
Followed by Qualifying Employment
Termination(1)

  Acceleration
of Unvested
Supplemental
Long-Term
Incentive Award
(2)
   Acceleration of
Unvested Stock
Options ($)(3)
   Total 

Nigel Travis

  $            6,354,000    $612,000    $    6,966,000  

Termination Due to Death or by
the Company Due to Disability

 Acceleration of
Unvested
Performance
Stock Awards (1)
 Acceleration of
Restricted Stock
Awards (2) (3)
 Acceleration of
Unvested Stock
Options (4)
 Total 

Paul Carbone

  $893,838    $400,558    $1,294,396   $81,859  $543,118  $  $624,977 

David Hoffmann

           120,845          2,099,016         2,219,861 

Paul Twohig

  $    $308,922    $308,922   120,386             65,434  185,820 

John Costello

  $1,147,787    $        347,266    $1,495,053  

William Mitchell

  $    $475,311    $475,311   81,859        81,859 

(1) PSUs remain outstanding and eligible to become earned in accordance with the award terms and to vest on the vesting date. The number of earned PSUs, if any, will be prorated based on the number of the days that have elapsed in the vesting period from the date of grant to the date of such termination of employment (but not more than 1,096 days) over 1,096. Amounts in this column represent the fair market value of the awards on December 30, 2016,pro-rated by the 311 days that elapsed in the vesting period (311/1,096). In the case of Mr. Hoffmann’s October 3, 2016 award, the number of days that elapsed in his vesting period was 88.

(2) If Mr. Carbone’s employment terminates due to the his death or is terminated by the Company due to the his permanent disability, the number of shares that became vested under his restricted stock award of February 12, 2015 are prorated based on the number of days that have elapsed in the vesting period from the date of grant to the date of such termination of employment (but not more than 1,460). Amount in this column represent the fair market value of the awards on December 30,2016, plus $47,688 in cash dividends earned on such award but not yet paid as of December 30, 2016,pro-rated by the 687 days that elapsed in the vesting period (687/1,460).

(3) If Mr. Hoffmann’s employment terminates due to his death or is terminated by the Company due to his permanent disability, his restricted stock units would become immediately vested and Mr. Hoffmann would have realized the acceleration value in this column.

(4) In the event that Mr. Twohig’s employment had terminated due to his death or was terminated by the Company due to his disability on December 30, 2016, the number of options that became vested would have beenpro-rated based on the number of days that elapsed from February 28, 2014 through the termination date (1036). As of that date, the closing price of a share of our common stock ($52.44) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was greater than the exercise price of Mr. Twohig’s supplemental award ($51.67), therefore amount reflected in the table above reflects the value of the award assuming Mr. Twohig exercised the vested options on that date.

Change in Control/Change
in Control Followed by
Qualifying Employment
Termination (1)

 Acceleration
of Performance
Stock Awards (2)
  Acceleration
of Restricted
Stock Awards (3)
  Acceleration of
Unvested Stock
Options ($) (4)
  Total 

Nigel Travis

 $        9,477,412  $—    $    4,918,047  $    14,395,459 

Paul Carbone

  288,480       1,154,225   1,206,781   2,649,486 

David Hoffmann

  1,505,066   2,099,016   —     3,604,082 

Paul Twohig

  424,255   —     1,843,126   2,267,382 

William Mitchell

  288,480   —     1,348,609   1,637,090 

 

(1) For a description and quantification of the cash severance benefits a named executive officer would receive upon a termination without cause (or for good reason with respect to Mr. Travis)Messrs. Travis and Hoffmann), whether before or after a change in control, please see the tables above.

(2)Amounts shown with respect to all supplemental long-term incentive awardsin this table assume a qualifying termination and a change in control both occur on December 26, 2015. With30, 2016.

(2) Amount shown for Mr. Travis includes $7,866,000 with respect to Mr. Travis’s February 28, 2014 supplemental award, plus $477,000 in dividends earned on such award but not yet paid as of December 30, 2016. For this award, in the event a change in control occurs on or prior to December 31, 2018, to the extent the shares have not become earned and eligible to vest in whole or in part as of the date such change in control is consummated, and to the extent the shares are outstanding as of immediately prior to the change in control, upon the consummation of such a change in control the restricted shares subject to the award shallwill be deemed earned and shall become eligible to vest in full and shallwill vest on December 31, 2018, generally subject to Mr. Travis remaining continuously employed through that date. If Mr. Travis experienced a qualifying termination on the change in control date, however, he would become vested in all of the restricted shares. With respect toAll other amounts in this column reflect the awards for Messrs. Carbone, Twohig and Costello,value of PSUs granted in fiscal 2016, plus the value of dividend equivalent units earned but not yet paid as of December 30, 2016. In the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control, (or ifand assuming the awards were not assumed in connection with such change in control),Compensation Committee had determined that the awardperformance objective had been met at the target level as of that date, these awards would have become vested in full and theyrealized the acceleration values shown in the above table.

(3) In the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control, amounts shown in respect to restricted stock and RSU awards would become immediately vested and Messrs. Carbone and Hoffmann would have realized the acceleration values shown in the above table. Amount for Mr. Carbone includes $47,688 in cash dividends earned on his award but not yet paid as of December 30, 2016. Mr. Hoffmann’s RSU award is not eligible to earn dividends prior to vesting.

(4) Amounts shown in respect of supplemental long-term incentive awards have been determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to such awards by the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 24, 2015 ($42.36).

(3) For Messrs. Carbone, Twohig, Costello and Mitchell, amount includes the value of outstanding options granted prior to our IPO that would immediately vest upon a change in control. For purposes of this table, the value with respect to 50% of each unvested pre-IPO award held by Messrs. Carbone, Twohig, Costello, Mitchell is included. With respect to stock options granted following our IPO held by all named executive officers, these would only vest upon a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control (or if the awards were not assumed in connection with such change in control). The value with respect to 100% of each option granted following our IPO held by Messrs. Travis, Carbone, Twohig, Costello and Mitchell is included. Amounts shown in respect of options assume that the options are cashed out for a payment equal to the difference between the fair market value of a share of common stock ($42.3652.44 per share),share, the closing price of our common stock on December 24, 2015,30, 2016, the last business day of our 20152016 fiscal year), and the per share exercise price of the respective options.

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 2224 of this Proxy Statement describes our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2015.2016. The Board of Directors is asking shareholders to cast anon-binding, advisory vote indicating their approval of that compensation by voting FOR the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to its named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.”

As described in detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have a total compensation approach focused on performance-based incentive compensation that seeks to:

 

Attract and retain industry-leading talent;

 

Link compensation actually paid to achievement of our financial, operating and strategic goals;

 

Reward individual performance and contribution to our success; and

 

Enhance shareholder value by aligning the interests of our executive officers and shareholders through delivering a substantial portion of an executive officer’s compensation through equity-based awards with a long-term value horizon.

The Board is asking shareholders to support this proposal. Although the vote we are asking you to cast isnon-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the views of our shareholders as expressed in their votes. The Board and Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when determining future compensation arrangements for our named executive officers.

The Board will continue to ask shareholders to cast anon-binding, advisory vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers every year until the next shareholder vote on the frequency of such advisory vote, which is currently expected to be held no later than the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2, Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation.

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Audit Committee Report

We operate in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of Dunkin Brands’ accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”), the Audit Committee is composed entirely of members who are independent, as defined by the listing standards of NASDAQ and Dunkin’ Brands’ Corporate Governance Guidelines. Further, the Board has determined that one of our members (Mr. Hines) is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the rules of the SEC.

The Audit Committee met 87 times during fiscal 20152016 with Dunkin’ Brands’ Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller and KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), Dunkin Brands’ independent registered public accounting firm, including 4 meetings held prior to the public release of Dunkin’ Brands’ quarterly earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We received the written disclosures and the letter from KPMG pursuant to Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) concerning any relationships between KPMG and Dunkin’ Brands and the potential effects of any disclosed relationships on KPMG’s independence, and discussed with KPMG its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors and KPMG Dunkin’ Brands’ internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. We reviewed with both KPMG and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

We discussed and reviewed with KPMG communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States) and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of KPMG’s examination of Dunkin’ Brands’ consolidated financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations with and without management present.

Audit and Other Fees

The aggregate fees that Dunkin’ Brands paid for professional services rendered by KPMG for the fiscal year ended December 26, 201531, 2016 (fiscal 2015)2016) and the fiscal year ended December 27, 201426, 2015 (fiscal 2014)2015) were:

 

  2015   2014   Fiscal 2016   Fiscal 2015 

Audit

  $1,740,012    $1,582,698    $1,824,710    1,922,855 

Audit Related

   12,000     390,000         12,000 

Tax

   140,507     440,648     144,121    140,507 

All Other

   1,780    1,650 
  

 

   

 

 

Total

  $            1,892,519    $            2,413,346    $            1,970,611                2,077,012 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of Dunkin’ Brands’ consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, reviews of interim consolidated financial statements, audits of subsidiaries and affiliates for statutory or regulatory purposes and assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC with respect to fiscal 20152016 and fiscal 2014.2015.

 

Audit related fees in fiscal 2015 were for consents to incorporate by reference in registration statements Dunkin’ Brands consolidated financial statements including KPMG’s audit opinions, and fees in fiscal 2014 were for certain procedures performed by KPMG related to a debt refinancing completed in January 2015.opinions.

 

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance and routine tax advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals.

All Other fees consisted of an annual subscription to KPMG’s proprietary online research tool.

Wepre-approve all audit services and all permittednon-audit services by KPMG, including engagement fees and terms. We have delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chair, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit Dunkin’ Brands from engaging KPMG to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions orcontribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to the audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. In addition, we evaluate whether Dunkin’ Brands’ use of KPMG for permittednon-audit services is compatible with maintaining KPMG’s independence. We concluded that KPMG’s provision ofnon-audit services in fiscal 2016, all of which we approved in advance, was compatible with its independence.

We reviewed the audited consolidated financial statements of Dunkin’ Brands as of December 26, 2015 and for the fiscal 2015year ended December 31, 2016 with management and KPMG. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of Dunkin’ Brands’ consolidated financial statements, and KPMG has the responsibility for the audit of those consolidated financial statements.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and KPMG, we voted that Dunkin’ Brands’ audited consolidated financial statements be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 20152016 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected KPMG as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2016,2017, subject to ratification by Dunkin’ Brands’ shareholders.

Audit Committee

Michael F. Hines, Chair

Irene Chang Britt

Carl Sparks

PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has appointed KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.30, 2017. We are asking shareholders to ratify this appointment. Representatives of KPMG will attend the Annual Meeting, where they will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will be available to answer questions from the shareholders.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3, Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

PROPOSAL 4

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING A REPORT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OFK-CUP PODS BRAND PACKAGING

Mr. Dale Wannen has advised the Company that he intends to present the following shareholder proposal at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with applicable proxy regulations, the proposed resolution and supporting statement, for which the Board of Directors and the Company accept no responsibility, are set forth below. Mr. Wannen is the owner of 100 shares of Company stock, and his address is 555 Maria Drive, Petaluma, CA 94954. Approval of this proposal would require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Your Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST Proposal 4, Shareholder Proposal.

Shareholder Proposal

Report onK-Cup Pods

Whereas, Dunkin’ Brands Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) states that the company is “committed to showing constant improvement in the area of corporate social responsibility. This involves continuous improvement in four areas that govern CSR strategy: Our Guests, Our Plant, Our People and Our Neighborhoods” yet a large part of revenue was derived from the sale of“K-Cup” pods brand product packaging which is not recyclable nor compostable and new studies suggest plastic packaging that reaches the ocean is toxic to marine animals and potentially to humans.

Whereas, it was announced in July 2016 that more than 300 million Dunkin’K-Cup pods were sold in the first year since being made available at retail outlets nationwide.

Whereas, according to “Kill theK-Cup”, an ad campaign against the product, there were enoughK-Cups discarded in 2014 to circle the earth more than 10 times.

Whereas, the #7 plastic used in Dunkin BrandK-Cups is a mix of plastics which is what makes it a problem for recycling.

Whereas,K-Cups have been confirmed to beBPA-free and made of “safe” plastic, but some studies show that even this type of material can have harmful effects when heated. When you come into contact with these plastic chemicals, they can act like estrogen in your body, negatively effecting hormones. The plastics can find their way into landfills to be incinerated or into the world’s oceans where plastics concentrate and transfer toxic chemicals such as polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins into the marine food web and potentially to human diets.

Whereas, officials in the city of Hamburg, the second-largest city in Germany are now banning the use ofK-Cups from all government buildings due to “causing unnecessary resource consumption and waste generation and often contain polluting aluminum…We in Hamburg thought that these shouldn’t be bought with taxpayers’ money.”

Whereas, recent financial data shows that Americans have decreased the amount ofK-Cup’s usage. Manufacturers of these cups, Keurig Green Mountain Inc. and JM Smucker, saw a decrease in pod

sales during the fourth quarter of 2015, which could suggest future declines. With Dunkin Brands sharing 50 percent of the profits earned through the sale ofK-cups with its franchisees this could not only pose an environmental threat but also a threat to the bottom line.

Whereas, several recyclable or compostable alternative pods have been brought to the market which could be considered by Dunkin Brands.

RESOLVED: Shareowners of Dunkin Brands request the Board to issue a report at reasonable cost, omitting confidential information, by October 1, 2017 assessing the environmental impacts of continuing to useK-Cup Pods brand packaging.

Supporting Statement: Proponents believe the report should include an assessment of the reputational, financial, and operational risks associated with continuing to useK-Cup packaging and, to the extent possible, goals and a timeline to either phase out this type of packaging or find an environmentally friendly alternative.

Board of Directors’ Statement in Opposition to Shareholder Proposal

The Board recommends that shareholders voteAGAINSTthe shareholder proposal.

The Board has carefully considered this proposal and believes that the requested report would be duplicative of the disclosure already made by us and our manufacturing partner, Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (“Keurig”) and thus would be a waste of our resources and not in the best interests of our stockholders, our franchisees, or our guests.

Dunkin’ Brands has already addressed the underlying concern and the essential objective of the proposal through the release of our Sustainable Packaging Statement.

We are not a manufacturer of Dunkin’ Donuts brandedK-Cup pods. Rather, we have entered into a license arrangement with Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. (“Keurig”), pursuant to which Keurig is responsible for the manufacture of Dunkin’ Donuts brandedK-Cup pods.

We have previously released a statement on sustainable packaging, which is freely available on our website atwww.dunkinbrands.com/responsibility/our-planet/packaging (the “Packaging Statement”). Recognizing that Keurig’s manufacturing expertise makes it best situated to assess the environmental impact and recyclability ofK-Cup pods, our statement acknowledgesKeurig’s publicly stated intention to make 100 percent ofK-Cup pods recyclable by 2020 and also directs readers to Keurig’s website for more information regarding the environmental impact of itsK-Cup pods, which information would not otherwise be available to the Company.

The manufacturer is in the best position to complete the analysis requested by the shareholder proposal, and Keurig has already done so. Duplicative research would be a waste of company resources.

In June 2016, Keurig released its Fiscal Year 2015 Sustainability Report (the “Keurig Report”), which addressed the Proposal’s underlying concern by providing Keurig’s assessment of the environmental impact of itsK-Cup pods, addressing the downfalls of alternative packaging options and identifying Keurig’s goal of having 100 percent ofK-Cup pods recyclable by 2020. A complete copy of the Keurig Report is freely available on Keurig’s website atwww.keuriggreenmountain.com/Sustainability/Overview.

The Keurig Report details a 2012K-Cup pods life-cycle assessment conducted by Keurig to evaluate the pods from cultivation of coffee beans through pod disposal in order to estimate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions (a measure of the emissions that lead to the greenhouse effect) and “Primary Energy Demand” (a measure used by Keurig to show the total amount of energy extracted from the earth or produced via renewable methods) attributable to the various life-cycles ofK-Cup pods. As a result of the assessment, Keurig concluded that the disposal of the product packaging after use of aK-Cup pod represents a relatively small portion of the total environmental impact.

In addition to its assessment of the environmental impact ofK-Cup pods, the Keurig Report also details Keurig’s evaluation of new pod designs, including compostable pod options, addressing another concern identified in the shareholder proposal. Keurig has tested compostable pods, but has yet to find one that meets its standards for beverage freshness, quality and taste because they don’t adequately protect ingredients from moisture and oxygen without additional packaging, and most compostable products don’t currently degrade in home settings, but require sophisticated commercial facilities.

By providing an assessment of the environmental impact ofK-Cup pods, addressing the downfalls of alternative packaging options and identifying the goal of having 100 percent ofK-Cup pods recyclable by 2020, the Keurig Report provides information that is not otherwise available to the Company to address the Proposal’s underlying concern and essential objective of a public report detailing the environmental impact of continued use ofK-Cup pods brand packaging.

Conclusion

Together with our franchisees and our suppliers, we continuously assess our packaging and look for opportunities for continuous improvement. We will continue to have dialogue with ourK-Cup manufacturer on their efforts in this area. However, the report called for by the shareholder proposal would duplicate efforts and be a waste of company resources, which would not be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

Therefore, your Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST this proposal.

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES

The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of votes properly cast by the shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required for the election of directors. However, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that in an uncontested election of directors, any nominee for director who receives a greater number of votes “withheld” from his or her election than votes “for” such election shall promptly tender his or her resignation for consideration and action by the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and the Board. See “Corporate Governance – Governance—Majority Voting Guidelines” above. All other proposals require the approval by holders of a majority of votes properly cast by the shareholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

If you vote your shares by mail, telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted in accordance with your directions. If you do not indicate specific choices when you vote by mail, telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted for the election of the director nominees, to approve Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation), and for the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.firm, and against the shareholder proposal. The persons named as proxies will also be able to vote your shares at postponed or adjourned meetings. If any nominee should become unavailable, your shares will be voted for another nominee selected by the Board or for only the remaining nominees. Brokers are not permitted to vote your shares on any matter other than Proposal 3 (Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm). If your shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee and you do not instruct the broker or nominee how to vote, withbrokers or nominees are not permitted to vote your shares on any matter other than Proposal 3 (Ratification of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm). With respect to the election of directors or the advisory vote on named executive officer compensation and the shareholder proposal, if you do not instruct the broker or nominee how to vote or if you abstain or withhold authority to vote, on any matter, your shares will not be counted as having been voted on that matter, but will be counted as in attendance at the meeting for purposes of a quorum.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

A shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in the proxy materials for that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to us so that it is received by our Corporate Secretary no later than November 28, 2016.27, 2017. Written proposals may be mailed to us at Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc., 130 Royall Street, Canton, MA 02021 Attn: Rich Emmett, Corporate Secretary. A shareholder who intends to nominate a director or present any other proposal at the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders but does not wish the proposal to be included in the proxy materials for that meeting must provide written notice of the nomination or proposal to us no earlier than January 11, 201710, 2018 and no later than February 10, 2017.9, 2018. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Ourby-laws, which are available at http://investor.dunkinbrands.com, describe the requirements for submitting proposals at the Annual Meeting. The notice must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by ourby-laws.

OTHER MATTERS

At the time of mailing of this proxy, we do not know of any other matter that may come before the Annual Meeting and do not intend to present any other matter. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary

authority to vote the shares represented by the proxies in accordance with their own judgment, including the authority to vote to adjourn the meeting.

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. Our officers, directors and other associates may assist in soliciting proxies by mail, telephone and personal interview.

ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING

The Annual Meeting will take place at the Boston Marriott Quincy, located at 1000 Marriott Drive, Quincy, MA 02169. To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a Dunkin’ Brands shareholder as of the close of business on March 17, 2016,16, 2017, or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a shareholder. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, the Notice will serve as an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you received a paper copy of the proxy materials in the mail, the proxy card includes an admission ticket for one shareholder to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. You may alternatively present a brokerage statement showing proof of your ownership of Dunkin’ Brands stock as of March 17, 2016.16, 2017.All shareholders must also present a valid form of government-issued picture identification in order to attend. Please allow additional time for these procedures. Free parking is available. Please enter the building through the main lobby.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC

130 ROYALL STREET

CANTON, MA 02021

  

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

 

   Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
   

 

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

 

   If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
   

 

VOTE BY PHONE -1-800-690-6903

 

   Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
   

 

VOTE BY MAIL

 

   Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

 

 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

 

 DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 

   

For

All

 

Withhold  

All  

 

For All

Except

   To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.        
  

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

            
  

 

1.

 

 

Election of Directors

  ¨ ¨ ¨  

 

    
   

 

Nominees

              
           
  01 Raul AlvarezIrene Chang Britt                 02  Anthony Dinovi                03  Nigel TravisMichael Hines  
  
  The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.3:    For Against Abstain
  
  2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid by Dunkin’ Brands to its named executive officers ¨ ¨ ¨
  
  3. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as Dunkin’ Brands independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 201630, 2017  ¨ ¨ ¨
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST proposal 4:ForAgainstAbstain
4.Shareholder proposal regarding a report on the environmental impact ofK-Cup pods brand packaging
  

 

NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

     

LOGOLOGO  

                
  

 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

 

         
                     
                     
  Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date      Signature (Joint Owners) Date     
                                


LOGOLOGO

130 Royall Street

Canton, MA 02021

Annual Meeting Admission Ticket

(and meeting Information)information)

20162017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

10:00 a.m. (EDT), Wednesday, May 11, 201610, 2017

Boston Marriott Quincy

1000 Marriott Drive

Quincy, Massachusetts 02169

Please present this admission ticket and photo identification to gain admittance to thisthe meeting.

This ticket admits only the shareholder listed on the reverse side and is not transferable.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Fiscal 20152016 Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.www.proxyvote.com

 

 

         
   

 

DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 11, 201610, 2017 10:00 AM

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors

   

LOGOLOGO

 

 

 

The shareholder(s) whose signature(s) appear(s) on the reverse side of this Proxy Card hereby appoint(s) NIGEL TRAVIS PAUL CARBONE and RICHARD EMMETT, or anyeither of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held at the Boston Marriott Quincy, 1000 Marriott Drive, Quincy, Massachusetts 02169 on Wednesday, May 11, 201610, 2017 at 10:00 a.m., and any adjournment or postponement thereof, all the shares of Common Stock of the Company which the shareholder(s) could vote, if present, in such manner as the proxies may determine on any matters which may properly come before the meeting and to vote as specified on the reverse.

 

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES, FOR PROPOSAL 2, AND FOR PROPOSAL 3.3 AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 4. THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT.

 

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the Election of all Director nominees, and FOR Proposals 2 and 3.3 and AGAINST Proposal 4.

 

Continued and to be signed on reverse side